WE’VE hit “peak digital” one headline screamed. Life’s beginning to suck for Zuckerberg. At long last, the Meta universe’s imperial forces are coming under serious attack. Faceboke, Twit-ter and Insta-sham are crumbling. Social meedja’s day of reckoning has finally arrived. We’re free!
The reason for such hysteria? The stock of Facebook’s owner Meta Platforms slumped by an incredible $230 billion last week as the web behemoth reported a fall in daily active users – the first time in its 18-year history. Even the saucer-eyed one’s personal wealth tumbled by nearly $31bn, the same as the GDP of Estonia.
Could this be the first hint that the growth of Jack’s internet Beanstalk has finally stopped? I’m sure I’m not the only one who feels a little sense of smugness about Zuckerberg’s “troubles”. For once his inexorable rise has hit a rocky patch. Nice to see him brought down a notch or two – now he only has $85bn left to play with. The internet really does bring out your worst traits.
Read more: Politics: Covid fraud: Welcome to Boycie's Britain, where honesty is for mugs
As a member of Generation X, I have a foot in both camps – not quite a digital native, but also not a knuckle-dragging Luddite. I grew up with dial-up phones, VHS cassettes, tapes that got stuck and clunky Atari ping-pong games. Technology existed, but it just wasn’t that sophisticated. If there was something good on telly, I’d have to wait a WHOLE WEEK to watch the next episode. I witnessed from distant sidelines the biggest change in social history since industrialisation, but unlike soothsayers like David Bowie, I wasn’t smart enough at the time to fully appreciate its significance.
So I have mixed feelings. Yes, it’s easy to slip into some sort of nostalgic fairy-tale of the good old days – browsing in records stores, reading proper books, people talking to one another rather than staring at their phones, and so on. But it wasn’t all that great – having to wait for your flatmate to get off the phone or waiting a WHOLE WEEK to watch the next episode of your favourite show.
But Facebook et al have turned our world upside down. The high-street stalwarts of our childhoods are no more. Our language, our social norms, our way of thinking and our mental health have all been affected. On the plus side, it offers instant news, convenience, free speech, unlimited reach and access. On the downside, it has amplified toxicity, with sometimes tragic results. It both holds the powerful to account while also offering them a useful tool for propaganda. It’s the age of echo chambers, rabbit holes, trolling, cancel culture and misinformation.
Read more: Health: Consumer: Let’s live life on the edge and eat some Dairylea
The internet isn’t dead – not by a long shot. But maybe, just maybe, we are seeing a little – but not insignificant – shift. Facebook is cracking, Spotify clearly puts bucks before principle and the mind-crushing trash on streaming platforms has proved that quality, not quantity, does actually matter. People are buying vinyl records, CDs and printed products again.
My hope – idealistic, even naive, I freely admit – is that we will enter a new “post-virtual” world, where the shockwaves of the initial internet explosion start to smooth out. We are not nearly there yet, as society is still getting to grips with its impact, but maybe one day when the boom has dissipated we can pick up the pieces, learn the lessons and build something better, safer, kinder and more inclusive.
We’ll never turn back the clock, but life can find a new equilibrium where both “virtual” and “reality” co-exist in support rather than against one another. The alternative? Self-destruction.
Our columns are a platform for writers to express their opinions. They do not necessarily represent the views of The Herald.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here