MOLLIGRANT
FRIENDS at the Dictionaries of the Scots Language (DSL) have flagged to me that there has been quite a lot of correspondence about Scots words for “complain”, and suggested that one might make a good Word of the Week. Happy to help!
Scots has indeed many fine words for complaining, ranging from straightforward compleen through gronach and grumble to rather obscure peenge and yirm. One of my favourites is molligrant, which can be both a noun and a verb.
DSL’s first citation of the word (in one of many spelling-variants) dates from 1811, from the Roxburgh poet Andrew Scott, a “peasant-poet” from the period: “Waes me, the mulligrumphs she’s ta-en”. Walter Scott (no relation) deployed the word, describing how a correspondent’s “molligrunts so hampered me as to cost us at least one novel”, and the word has persisted ever since, not restricted to the Scottish Borders. A colourful Aberdonian grumbler is recorded from 1930 thus: “Fat 're ye haudin a’ the malagruntin’ aboot, ye discontented vratch?” And the novelist Helen Pryde, in one of her (once) well-known McFlannel books from 1947, records a determined piece of Glaswegian career advice: “e’s going to be a teacher, and none of his molliegruntin – or yours either – ’ll make me change it”.
The word’s origins are sadly obscure. DSL considers it to be a variant of molligrups “a fit of melancholy or sulks”, relating it to English mulligrubs, which is “[perhaps] a fanciful formation”. The Oxford English Dictionary does not add much, suggesting that mulli- comes from “mealy”. OED links it, rather desperately I fancy, to an Australian expression meaning “wichetty grub”, an eater of fruit trees that is shaped like a corkscrew.
Scots Word of the Week is written by Jeremy Smith, Professor Emeritus in English Language and Linguistics, University of Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here