IT might look like a recipe for emissions reduction success, but “pie in the sky” is how Client Earth has described the UK net-zero strategy. This week, the environmental law charity announced that it was taking the Government to court over it.
Its complaint is that the strategy fails to include the policies needed to deliver promised cuts in emissions, and is thus a breach of “the Government’s legal duties” and amounts to “greenwashing”.
At the same time, Friends of the Earth filed a similar law suit.
So, how are we doing in the Net Zero pie-tasting championships? What pieces of the UK strategy pie are missing?
Quite a lot it, seems. As Client Earth and Friends of the Earth point out, the strategy, which was published in October last year, is low on policy detail and does not specify the cuts in emissions to be achieved in all of the sectors.
In other words, we don’t even know how big each slice of the emissions reduction pie is. And several slices there may indeed be, since they are based on speculative technologies like zero-carbon aviation fuels, and carbon capture and storage.
Can the Government really be taken to court over this?
Yes, Client Earth will argue the government breached its legal duty under sections 13 and 14 of the Climate Change Act 2008 to show that its plan will actually reduce emissions enough to meet carbon targets. They will also argue that it’s an infringement of the rights of young people since the Climate Change Act demands that “as far as possible” legislation must be compatible with right protected under the European Convention of Human Rights. Client Earth will argue that breaches of future carbon budgets would threaten young people’s right to life, protected under the Human Rights Act.
Do other experts agree that the strategy is inadequate?
The UK Climate Change Committee had some reservations. For instance, it noted that “the Government has not quantified the effect of each policy and proposal on emissions. So it is not clear how the mix of policies will deliver on its ambitions”.
Is it any more greenwashed than any other country’s plan?
No. It would be true to say that the UK strategy is not the most fanciful in the sky. When it was submitted in October, the Climate Change Committee said it was the most comprehensive among G20 countries.
Does the Government have much of a defence?
Policy expert Tim Lord suggested its defence might be the following: that “many policies are market led so hard to attribute precise savings to them”, “15 years is a long time” and that the plan “should flex as costs change”.
All sounds too half-baked given what’s at stake
Yes. No matter how you slice it.
READ MORE: Householders pay the price as big oil and gas firms coin it in
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel