I TEND not to read stories about the royals if I can help it. The sight of Kate doing her bit for climate change by wearing a “recycled” dress or Charles grinning inanely under a hair-net as he handles a whipped cream dispenser in a cake factory leaves me cold.
No prizes for guessing my republican leanings. Sadly, serious questions over their continued existence remain muted so long as an uncritical spotlight is shone on the favourite acts in the circus. Celebrity and cute family photos shore up the monarchy like a leaking dam ready to burst.
So it’s left to the sideshows of ugly spats and allegations of sleaze that help to chip away at the crumbling House of Windsor.
But it was a throwaway comment Prince Harry made last week that caught my attention. Normally, his utterances are meaningless to me. However, his latest advice that people “stuck in jobs that don’t bring them joy” should quit and put their mental health and happiness first was just too preposterous to ignore. I admit, it really annoyed me. In his fairy tale world it sounds easy, but in reality . . . come off it, Harry.
Job guidance from someone who left his royal duties only to land a £112 million Netflix deal and set up home in a £11m mansion in California is just a bit rich. As families struggle with rising costs, job insecurity and mortgages, such idle comments simply infuriate, serving to highlight the yawning gap between the lucky privileged few and the rest of us.
The thing about royalty is that they are unremarkable people thrust into a remarkable situation. They have no real-life experience whatsoever. Harry will never have lived in fear of redundancy or missed out on a promotion, unless you consider his slipping down the ranks of royal lineage a burden to bear. He’s certainly never been exposed to the vagaries of the job market or had to survive on his wits in the workplace.
It’s not personal, I have no beef with them as individuals. They are simply the products of the flawed institution that moulded them. Indeed, I’m no fan, but the former Hollywood actress Meghan is the only one who has actually achieved anything without relying on an unearned birthright or marriage.
Read more: A Scottish pub that doesn’t sell booze … I’ll drink to that
Meanwhile, the prince’s highlighting of mental health issues, although laudable, is blind to the white elephant in the room. The tragic loss of his mother at a young age has clearly had a profound impact on him, and I sympathise. I don’t doubt his good intentions. But the problem is that for many who are battling their inner demons it is often a sense of powerlessness, the lack of a voice or material shortcomings that can instil feelings of low self-esteem.
The glamour and worship of perfection surrounding royalty perpetuates this. It celebrates inherited wealth, while the words of a duke will always matter more than yours or mine ever will.
It may not be on the scale of “let them eat cake”, but Harry’s comment speaks volumes about his underlying assumptions. Monarchy is the enemy of meritocracy, an anachronism that legitimises atises inequality. Bestowing prestige, power and prosperity to a select few by virtue of birth, regardless of their intellect is undemocratic and quite frankly astonishing in the modern age.
So, I’m sorry Harry, you may be a decent bloke and your heart may be in the right place, but I’d rather take work advice from someone who who has had some experience of life outside the rarefied protection of privilege.
PS, bang goes my knighthood.
Our columns are a platform for writers to express their opinions. They do not necessarily represent the views of The Herald.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel