Stone me! Brown Sugar’s gone sour, the headlines screamed. Mick and Keef have caved in to the woke brigade by axing their seminal stonker from their tour setlist. Cue much frothing at the mouth from the usual right-wing suspects. The age of woke is beyond a joke, they howled, branding the Glimmer Twins cowards for pandering to minority extremists. Case closed.
The theatrical outrage over Jagger and Richards’ decision to retire (for the time being) the blistering opening track from their Sticky Fingers album was as predictable as it was lazy. After all, the reasoning goes, what is the world coming to when wealthy white pensioners are made to feel uncomfortable singing about black slavery, rape, heroin and torture?
Read more: Bob Dylan, Mick Jagger, Phil Collins and Paul McCartney - fair play for keeping on going
Joking aside, I see this less a victory for cancel culture more a dawning of realisation in an age of heightened consciousness. Critics argue the track contains “some of the most stunningly crude and offensive lyrics ever written”.
Indeed, it does throw up some eye-wateringly inappropriate lines when viewed through the optics of today’s more sensitive times. “Scarred old slaver knows he’s doing alright/Hear him whip the women just around midnight” didn’t bat an eye in the Seventies.
But even for an era when ethnic appropriation and sexist attitudes were seldom if ever questioned, the song is pretty nasty stuff. They weren’t alone. Hendrix, Young and The Beatles all sung about shooting or beating their old lady/baby/woman, while even 10 years later The Police’s Every Breath You Take reads like a stalker’s charter.
The real problem lies in playing Brown Sugar live today, thereby perpetuating what should have been shown the red card years ago. It’s amazing it’s lasted so long.
The Stones themselves haven’t exactly been unequivocal in their decision to drop it, with Jagger hinting they may “put it back in”, while Richards insists the lyrics are a condemnation of slavery.
But whatever their motivation, the decision is an astute one, and bears all the hallmarks of why the brand has been so enduring – indeed it was 60 years ago on Sunday the dynamic duo first met, and, well, the rest is history.
Read more: Tangled up in blue… why I just couldn’t cancel Bob Dylan
Jagger was even aware of Brown Sugar’s damaging potential in the 90s when he said he would “never write that song now”. To be seen as dangerous and edgy is one thing, but to be out of step with current cultural norms is bad business.
So rather than being hounded out of Dodge by woke zealots, as the permanently offended would have us believe, the rock veterans are doing what they do best – picking up on the zeitgeist.
For me, the song’s visceral appeal lies more in its pulsating guitar riff than in its words. I wouldn’t object to it being played live with altered lyrics. This isn’t censorship, more a nuanced response to changing attitudes.
If you want to listen to Brown Sugar, then play it at home. As a historic reference point to one of music’s greatest acts at the height of their powers, it stands out. But let’s show some sympathy for the old devils. They haven’t sold out. The Rolling Stones are the ultimate rock survivors. Pulling the plug on Brown Sugar proves that.
Our columns are a platform for writers to express their opinions. They do not necessarily represent the views of The Herald.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel