“Bathgate no more, Linwood no more, Methil no more, Irvine no more.”
The Proclaimers’ take down of Thatcher’s cruel policies on working class Scots in Letter From America shocked me. It sounds ridiculous to admit now, but back then it wasn’t the injustice that provoked my ire – it was the fact they sung with such strong Scottish accents, thick enough to stand a spurtle in a plate of porridge.
Why did the “cringe” grip me when hearing my own accent? The answer is simple – I didn’t think it was cool, mainly because I wasn’t used to hearing it so upfront and in your face on prime time TV. Scots accents have always existed on the box, but I wasn’t accustomed to them being on Top of the Pops.
Read more: Bob Dylan, Mick Jagger, Phil Collins and Paul McCartney - fair play for keeping on going
I now regard The Proclaimers as cultural pioneers and as a nation we’ve grown in self confidence about who we are. Sean Connery’s brogue seemed absent in early interviews, probably because of the need to fit into London society, but it returned in later years. Today, stars such as David Tennant, Peter Capaldi or Kelly Macdonald take pride in their accents. Rightly so.
But when I was growing up Scots accents weren’t the voices of the ruling elite. Years of listening to establishment figures on TV had brainwashed me into thinking upper class people with received pronunciation were more intelligent and better than me. No wonder I suffered from an inferiority complex when I heard The Proclaimers.
So it was a bit of a "what, really?" moment when I read the Times’ report about the Scottish Council of Independent Schools’ decision to publish a “myth buster” for parents. In it the SCIS assured parents “your child is unlikely to pick up a Scottish accent” as if having one was some sort of terrible affliction to be ashamed of.
The SCIS defended its actions as “something potential parents overseas have raised in the past, however light-heartedly”. I can understand why – as a privately-run entity it is looking after its profits, playing to the petty prejudices of its customers.
A 2019 survey by Accent Bias Britain found the UK public has consistently viewed “posher” accents as the most prestigious, while other ethnic or regional dialects received low ratings.
Read more: Covid Scotland: Power and pitfalls of humour in the workplace
Indeed, Dr Alexander Baratta from the University of Manchester likened “accentism” to racism. In France last year politicians even voted to make accent bias illegal.
I like the idea in theory, but in practical terms it’s difficult. Unless there is clear proof that the way you speak has held you back, then the subtle sleights and exclusions will continue.
Besides how would you classify a Scottish accent and enshrine it in law? The accent of River City’s Roisin McIntyre is very different from posh Edinburgh.
While laws aimed at tackling sexism, ageism and racism are crucial, should we add accentism, sizeism and uglinessism to the list? Our only hope is that awareness improves and prejudice fades over time. It’s not ideal, but ultimately we all have a role to play by not stereotyping people because of the way they speak. Only then will we value what they have said rather than how they said it.
The simple truth is Scottish accents are incredibly cool. The stronger the better. So be loud, be proud and sing your burr from the rooftops. Altogether now "When you go will send back a letter from America?"
Our columns are a platform for writers to express their opinions. They do not necessarily represent the views of The Herald.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel