If you find yourself in the unfortunate position that calling 999 for an ambulance is necessary, you dearly hope that it arrives in the blink of an eye.
Of course, that expectation doesn’t match the practicality of one arriving, but measuring that time in minutes rather than hours, or days, is the hope. However, it emerged recently that the average wait for an ambulance in Scotland had reached six hours. That is a desperately long wait for help.
If you think how much someone’s condition might deteriorate over the course of an hour, or two, or six, particularly if they are older, frail, or living alone without support nearby, it paints a really desperate picture.
This is unacceptable and extremely dangerous, not to mention distressing for those making and receiving calls. The tragic death of 65-year-old Gerard Brown this week following an unfathomable 40 hour wait for an ambulance illustrates precisely what is at risk if this situation is not brought under control as a matter of urgency.
READ MORE: Military support for ambulance service called in amid 'unacceptable' waiting times
I cannot imagine how Mr Brown’s family and loved ones are feeling in the wake of this devastating loss, which will be even harder to come to terms with knowing that more urgent treatment may well have saved his life.
This tragic case has clearly set alarm bells ringing within the Scottish Government, with the First Minister announcing that the government is seeking targeted military assistance to alleviate pressure on the ambulance service. However, there is the big question of why it has taken loss of life and news on the front pages to bring about such urgent action.
At Age Scotland, we want to help older people be as well as they can be, and key to this work is ensuring services are robust and accessible enough to meet their needs both now and in the future. In a crisis and in normal times.
Earlier this year we consulted with older people, as part of some joint work with the Scottish Ambulance Service, about their expectations when calling 999 for an ambulance – particularly following a fall.
Their overwhelming view was how important it is to receive reassurance from the ambulance service, particularly as they would not call unless they thought their situation was serious enough to need urgent attention.
Although alternative means of community support in an emergency were discussed, people told us that unless there was a direct line to access this support and a guarantee they would be responsive, their immediate instinct would always be to call 999 and request an ambulance.
Unfortunately, this much-needed reassurance is harder to get due to the immense pressure services are under, and the time it takes an ambulance to arrive has become akin to a roll of the dice.
There is no doubt that the NHS, emergency services and social care are in the midst of a perfect storm - hospitals are operating close to full capacity, A&E waiting times are through the roof and delayed discharge figures are rising rapidly.
READ MORE: Annie Wells resigns as Douglas Ross' Scottish Conservative health spokesperson
This is a truly worrisome situation to be in and demonstrates the lasting and volatile impact of Covid-19. And this is happening before the autumn and winter, when existing health conditions are often exacerbated and icier weather will almost inevitably lead to an increase in falls and injuries among older people.
We’re very lucky that our ambulance service is packed to the gunnels with skilled and dedicated crew but in recent months the pressure they have been under seems extraordinary. Stretched, at times, to breaking point, I do not envy them but offer the most grateful thanks for everything they do.
These services are in desperate need of support to handle an immediate challenge of ensuring fair, equal, and speedy access to medical treatment in an emergency.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here