AH, ABBA. The first band I remember loving. I was 10 when the Swedish foursome – Agnetha, Bjorn, Benny and Anni-Frid – won Eurovision in 1974 with Waterloo. On a school trip to Germany three years later I remember buying an album of their greatest hits. It was only when I got back on the bus that one of the older kids pointed out to me that it was actually an album of German covers of Abba songs. You may not be surprised to learn I dropped German soon after.
I drifted away from the band too, before they split in 1981. Still, I couldn’t help but tune in for yesterday’s announcement that for the first time in nearly four decades ABBA are releasing a new album and staging a concert series with holograms of their younger selves.
Of course, for some it may have felt like they’ve never been away.Somewhere even now, Dancing Queen is playing on the radio. And yet the fall and rise of ABBA’s reputation is an interesting lesson in the swirling currents of cultural taste-making.
For all their post-Eurovision success in the 1970s you could never say they were ever hip. ABBA’s original crime was their inauthenticity. By the punk years they were fully immersed in the world of light entertainment and as such beyond the pale.
Never mind that Elvis Costello admitted a musical debt to the Swedish quartet, the critic Robert Christgau said of the band in 1979: “We have met the enemy and they are them.”
That attitude towards ABBA took a while to go away. When the Sex Pistols staged a reunion show in 1997 on the 20th anniversary of their album Never Mind the Bollocks, they pre-empted their appearance on stage by playing Dancing Queen, a symbol of everything they overthrew when they had their own moment in the sun
Even as they conquered the world, Abba were dismissed as kitsch and sentimental. It’s true that their music and image contained both those aspects. But what struck even the youngest of listeners (and, yes, my hand is up here) was how grown-up they could sound.
Read More: Neil Tennant on ABBA (and Pet Shop Boys)
Songs like Knowing Me, Knowing You and The Winner Takes It All were slices of Ingmar Bergman pop that spoke to adult sensibilities and situations. They were not about the joys of first love but the final limits of it. The fact that the two couples in the band themselves split suggested the emotional depths of the songs came from personal experience.
But in the years after the band broke up that depth wasn’t much acknowledged. In fact, initially, the band’s reputation seemed to fall off a cliff. In the 1980s, Bjorn Ulvaeus once admitted, “ABBA were distinctly 'uncool', totally out of fashion. And I thought 'Well, that's it. It was fun while it lasted, but now it's over’.”
And yet by the 1990s the band in absentia were on an upward trajectory. A lot of that had to do with the gay community’s love of ABBA. (A love that continues to the present day. Gay Times prefaced yesterday’s announcement with the immortal line: “Get ready dancing queens!”)
But they weren’t the only ones. Indeed, the ageing punks at that Sex Pistols gig rather than jeer Dancing Queen, as the Pistols might have hoped, all sang along.
And, of course, the mums and dads who loved ABBA back in the 1970s still loved them in the 1980s and 1990s and were the perfect audience for Judy Craymer’s 1999 jukebox musical MAMMA MIA!
These days the band’s appeal is wide enough to encompass both Gary Barlow and Jarvis Cocker.
Their reputation doesn’t really need this latest fillip. But who knows? Maybe the four people behind it did. Doesn’t everyone want an encore?
Our columns are a platform for writers to express their opinions. They do not necessarily represent the views of The Herald.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel