IT would be easier and quicker for the Tories to just line up the poor and punch folk individually in the face. If you want to deliver pain and suffering, after all, get it done in the most efficient, speediest manner.
‘The poor’ – what a nonsense term. It makes poverty seem something far away, experienced only by others – as if poverty is out of sight and out of mind. ‘Oh, the poor? They live just over that hill. Turn right at the disabled, then left at the immigrants.’
People living in poverty are everywhere – serving in shops and restaurants, cleaning offices, getting the nation to work. What a limiting and controlling word ‘poor’ is – like shackles – as if poverty must and should be a permanent state. ‘He’s poor’. ‘She’s French’. ‘They’re ugly’.
Unless you’re born rich, poverty can get us all – and all of us have the capacity and talents to escape poverty if we’re given a fair chance in life.
Millions of us experience poverty. I grew up poor, so did half the so-called ‘middle class’ people I know. Middle class just means you’re working class but with a mortgage.
READ MORE: Where's the vision from Holyrood?
Poverty is scarring, it stays with you – you remember how bad it was; if you’ve even the suggestion of a soul you’ll not want others to experience it – which likely explains the inexhaustible capacity of spoilt, £15k-a-term private school Tories for inflicting misery on millions struggling to survive on low incomes and state support. I detest the words ‘benefits’ and ‘welfare’ – condescending, Dickensian sneers intended to measure and fix a person by the depth of their pocket; to humiliate, dehumanise and categorise.
But we were all meant to love ‘the poor’ post-pandemic – remember? We were meant to emerge from Covid into a utopia where we’d learned the lessons of the past and wanted to lift up those who’d carried us through the plague: the shop workers, bus drivers, cleaners and carers.
Self-deluding lies. We knew it back then when we spun ourselves phoney egalitarian tales – and we sure as hell know it now as the Tories turn the screw on the unemployed and folk on low wages. Chancellor Rishi Sunak – a multi-millionaire married to a woman richer than the Queen – is withdrawing the extra £20 in Universal Credit received weekly during pandemic.
Now £20 may mean nothing to a man who could clean his behind with bank notes, but to families on Universal Credit it’s the difference between going hungry and keeping warm. Such blind cruelty would make any atheist wish for an omnipotent judge in the afterlife.
Sunak has just got the go-ahead for a gym, tennis court and swimming poor at his £1.5m manor house. He also plans a 'wildlife area in the paddock'. Two businesses in which Sunak’s wife, Akshata Murty, is a major investor have gone into administration owing money to HMRC. One borrowed £1.3m from the government-backed Future Fund which Sunak launched last year. Not that any of this is a personal blow - Murty’s stake in her family’s global business empire is reportedly £625m. So what’s twenty quid?
READ MORE: Bring the rich to heel
Mortality rates for poor people in the most deprived communities are twice as high as affluent areas. This is a war on the poor - wars kill people. Government policy is killing people - they’re dying before they should.
Prices are rising, as a consequences of Brexit - the fantasy of the very people cutting Universal Credit. Douglas Ross, Scottish Tory leader, accused the Greens of being ‘anti-families’. Is there anything more ‘anti-family’ than leaving parents no option but to go hungry so their children eat?
Citizens Advice predicts more than two million people will be driven into debt and towards food banks because of the Universal Credit cut.
Meanwhile, vultures circle the poor. Not just loan sharks and pay-day loan companies - a fifth of all betting shops are in the UK’s poorest areas, ten times more likely to be found in the most deprived towns than the richest. Yet only 10% of supermarkets are located in poor areas. So if you’re poor you have to get a bus to buy groceries, but there’s a bookies round the corner.
Big banks have closed four times as many branches in poor areas as rich areas. The poorest now have to trek miles for free ATMs or face paying rip-off prices at cash machines charging fees.
Homelessness grows. There’s around 60,000 families with children currently living in temporary accommodation across Britain. Throughout lockdown it was the lowest paid who had to contend with bosses bullying them over furlough and forcing them to endure dangerous conditions. It’s the poorest who are still being paid less than the minimum wage by crooked employers and forced to jump through hoops on zero hours contracts.
None of this affects the middle class. It’s out of sight and out of mind - over that hill where the poor belong with the other outsiders.
None of this lets the SNP off the hook for its abysmal record in government. But here’s the rub - not only can, and does, the SNP hide behind Westminster’s failures, as it’s Westminster that must shoulder the biggest burden of blame (it’s Westminster cutting Universal Credit after all, not Holyrood), the SNP also reaps a dividend at the ballot box because of the war against the poor. To most decent Scots voters, anything is better than what’s being done in London.
Constitutionally, though, there may well be a price to pay for this. Poverty drives anger; anger drives change. Poor voters backed Brexit - because what did they have to lose? Who can blame them? In Scotland, there’s strong support among poorest voters for independence. Again, what do they have to lose? If the status quo has failed you, then to hell with the status quo - try something different.
As Boris Johnson sticks the knife into the poor, each turn of the blade creates another possible Yes voter. It’s the simple logic of political blowback. But Johnson is a fool - a wealthy fool - who’s too blind to see that, just as he’s too blind to see the poor in their millions around Britain.
Our columns are a platform for writers to express their opinions. They do not necessarily represent the views of The Herald
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel