THE principal of the University of Dundee has apologised for the prevalence of racism within his university and indeed across Dundee. Professor Iain Gillespie, discussing a research report by the university, on the prevalence of racism noted that “there is much in the report that makes for disturbing, shocking, and uncomfortable reading”.
One of the authors of the report, Dundee University’s Professor Hari Hundal, said that “it is incredibly important to see the realities of our students and staff and the horrendous challenges faced on a daily basis”. Indeed, racism was discussed as a “pervasive” issue both on and off campus.
Having read the report there are some issues of significance that could be raised regarding racism in the university. However, there is also clearly an ideological framework through which the report develops its conclusions that needs to be recognised if we are to get a genuine sense of problems of racism in this city and this institution.
Facebook, Covid and a worrying move by Scottish Government
Much is made of the student responses, but of the 16,000 students at Dundee only three percent responded to the survey. This is not a useful representative sample of either the black and ethnic minority (BAME) students, or the white students.
A statistically more useful third of staff responded to the survey. Of this number, when asked if they had witnessed or experienced racial discrimination, harassment or bullying, 76 percent of the BAME staff members said no.
It’s worth dwelling on this figure because it does not appear to fit with Professor Hundal’s representation of the “horrendous challenges faced on a daily basis” by BAME staff and students.
The question does not relate to “daily” experiences. Indeed, and unfortunately, there are no questions that give a sense of the regularity of experiencing racism – which is strange given the focus of the research.
It is likely that the staff asked have worked at Dundee for a certain amount of time, some for many years, and yet still, three quarters of BAME staff have never experienced or witnessed this type of racism.
Based on the most reliable statistical evidence from the report, the idea of pervasive, “horrendous” and “daily” racism in Dundee, is at best, questionable.
It would have been useful to have a follow up question to the 24 percent who had experienced racism at the university, but again this opportunity for some clarity about actual experiences is missed.
The authors of the report, from the outset, talk about “white privilege” and of “systemic” racism as if they are accepted facts while the survey often focuses on the feeling of BAME staff and students regarding the lack of diversity of the people in Dundee and Dundee university as a necessary problem.
Using the small number of students who responded to the survey and the even smaller number who volunteered to sit on a discussion group, all of whom were BAME students, the report finishes with quotes about the colonial nature of the curriculum, of “cultural appropriation” and “white supremacist thinking”.
The terms, categories and language used by some of these students appears to reflect that of the authors of the report and fit with a very particular understanding of racism and anti-racism that is associated with critical race theory.
Consequently, the report fails to engage objectively with the issues at hand and results in a clearly one-sided approach that elevates the problem of racism.
Unmasking the real reason for politicians' Covid hysteria
The subsequent demand that there be more unconscious bias training and the suggestion of compulsory “diversity” modules that all students must pass risks turning anti-racism into a disciplinary practice, where ideas are no longer freely discussed and contested but are turned into a dogma and a new form of intellectual punishment.
That is something the principal of any university should apologise for.
Our columns are a platform for writers to express their opinions. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Herald.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel