HUNDREDS of people lined the streets surrounding Glasgow Cathedral on May 3, 1978. The cathedral itself was filled with what would later by described, by Ron Ferguson, as “row upon row of sombre faces, straight out of a Who’s Who of Scottish political and ecclesiastical life”, the quietness “broken by a housewife wheeling her baby through the church in a push-chair”.
This was the memorial service for the Rev Geoff Shaw, convener of Strathclyde Region, who had died the previous week, aged 51. His vice-convener, Charles Gray, paid tribute to his “crusader-like zeal” in fighting for the deprived, the disadvantaged, the sick, elderly, persecuted, the disabled, and the lost; he had commanded respect for his fair play, compassion and integrity.
There had been a huge outpouring of grief when news emerged of Mr Shaw’s death. Prime Minister James Callaghan said: “He was a friend whom I admired for his breadth of vision, his desire to serve his fellow man, and his staunch principles. Scotland has lost one of her foremost sons.”
The Glasgow Herald said that Mr Shaw, who had died after suffering a second heart attack within seven weeks, had disregarded repeated pleas from colleagues to lighten his impossibly heavy load, having insisted on carrying on as convener of Scotland’s largest council and as chairman of its policy and resources committee.
“An ordained minister who devoted himself to community and social work rather than hold a charge,” the paper continued, “Geoff Shaw had combined political ambition with a personal reserve which was typified by his refusal of a knighthood in the last New Year’s honours list”.
The Herald’s Regional Correspondent, Claude Thomson, who had known him since both were young post-war servicemen in Malta, said the extent to which Mr Shaw would be missed could not be calculated. It would, he added, certainly be immense.
A year later, Ron Ferguson published Geoff, his biography of Mr Shaw, from which the Cathedral quote above was taken.
** Continues tomorrow.
Read more: Herald Diary
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here