THE councillors on Glasgow Corporation found it hard to contain their shock and outrage. A writer for Time magazine had visited the city, interviewing people, as he put it, “up and down the ladder”. But when his article (headlined “The Meanest City”) appeared in the magazine’s European editions in May 1973, there was considerable civic anger.
It contained, said Lord Provost William Gray, “gross distortions, inaccuracies, and fabrications of a kind which I have never seen in a serious journal in my life before”.
The writer said that violence had become nearly as much a part of life in Glasgow as The Troubles in Belfast, but without the excuse of a sectarian war. He added: “In an equally time-honoured way the Glaswegian fortifies himself with Scotch whisky before combat”.
He said that recent government studies had estimated that 12 per cent of the population could be legally classified as alcoholics. This figure was disputed by the Glasgow Council on Alcoholism; the writer maintained that his estimate included people who were not registered alcoholics but simply drank too much.
Another passage read: “Brawling fury may be one of the few ways the slum-dwelling Glaswegian, and now, it appears, his son, has left to fight back against his own uselessness, boredom and, perhaps, his approaching extinction.”
The feature described the career of many gang members and their initiation at a young age through fights and arrests, and listed the weapons used, such as razors and broken bottles.
The author conceded that one statistic – that there was one pub for every 23 Glaswegians – was a typographical error, but otherwise he stood by the rest of the article. His claim that Glasgow’s murder rate had tripled in eight years was, however, refuted by the police.
The article, it was acknowledged at the time, did at least mention the city’s parks, art galleries, and the presence of Scottish Opera and the Scottish National Orchestra.
Read more: Herald Diary
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel