DECEMBER 28, 1961. The resident engineer on the £10 million Clyde tunnels project was conducting a visiting party through the first of the two tunnels being driven beneath the river, between Linthouse and Whiteinch.
With understandable pride – work, after all. had been going on for three years – Mr Graham U. Biggart pointed out that it was possible, for the first time, to walk from one end to the other.
That word ‘walk’ was, however, hardly appropriate, as the Glasgow Herald correspondent who had made the journey wrote the following day in these pages.
“The tunnel is an obstacle course of hazard and glaur”, our correspondent noted.
“Progress was possible by the climbing of many ladders, by stepping gingerly along catwalks or between deep pools of water forming in the segments, and by generally minding one’s head.
“In the circumstances some sympathy was felt for the 500 men on the job, even for those whose earnings have reached £50 per week”.
As he emerged from the tunnel Mr Biggart acknowledged that the work was currently about a year behind schedule.
“The Clyde must be the hardest river in Britain to go under”, he said. “The ground is changing all the time, from soft sand right through to rock. It is much easier driving tunnels in the London clay”.
The first tunnel (pictured) was now completely driven – a tube of cast-iron segments 29ft in diameter and 21ft below the river bed. The second tunnel was at that time halfway across the Clyde.
Both tunnels would have two carriage lanes each 22ft wide, and below them a cycle track and pedestrian way.
The twin tunnels had been designed to form part of the city’s outer ring road, with the carriageways emerging onto flyovers at Shieldhall Road and Victoria Park.
The first tunnel was opened by the Queen on July 3, 1963. The second tunnel was opened in March of the following year.
Read more: Herald Diary
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel