THE operation to rescue the 42 miners trapped below ground at Redding Colliery, Stirlingshire, had continued round the clock ever since the flooding of pit number 23 early on Tuesday, September 25, 1923.
Great volumes of water had been extracted from the pit, while determined efforts were made to reach the men. Sightseers flocked to the pit-head. Several relief funds had been established; and three funerals had been held, attended by thousands of people.
Then, at 2.30am on Thursday, October 4, it was announced that five miners had been rescued alive. They were in excellent spirits, despite having lost all track of time and having shared nothing more than a half-slice of bread on the first day, surviving only on water.
“Bring Andy Thomson some Bovril when you come through”, one of the five, John Miller, told the rescue workers as they drilled a hole in the shaft where the five were waiting. After they were brought to the surface, they briefly smoked cigarettes or pipes as doctors examined them. After a few hours’ sleep in the rescue hall they were driven to their homes, where scenes of great emotion greeted them.
It was a “wonderful deliverance from death”, in the words of this newspaper’s special correspondent, though the bodies of four other miners were also recovered.
The five had each written farewell notes to their families while underground. The messages were destroyed once all of the men had been rescued.
The bodies of the remaining miners were retrieved over the next few weeks, and funerals were held (one of the processions is pictured here). In all, 40 miners had perished.
Slamannan-born Robert Horne, Chancellor of the Exchequer, said the Redding disaster had touched the sympathies of all people in the English-speaking world.
An official enquiry into the tragedy was held in Glasgow a few months later. When it reported, it made several recommendations for future safety in mines.
Read more: Herald Diary
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here