THE demands for a Second Front in the war against Hitler, to take some of the pressure off Stalin’s Red Army, had been growing steadily by the time Glasgow staged its May Day parade and rally in 1942.
“’Second Front Now’ quickly became as much of a slogan as well as a strategy; scrawled on walls, erected into a rallying cry for Communist-organized demonstrations, and attracting the support of Lord Beaverbrook and Michael Foot, as well as, latterly, the United States Chiefs of Staff”, Roy Jenkins says in his biography of Churchill. (Foot edited the Evening Standard, which was owned by Beaverbrook, who had served in Churchill’s wartime cabinet).
Amongst the dozens of groups and organisations taking part in the huge May Day parade were a number of Glasgow University students, wearing their red robes, and a band of refugees from Nazi-occupied countries.
Demands for a Second Front were loud and frequent, but they were criticised that evening by Bailie James Carmichael at a May Day meeting in Glasgow of the Independent Labour Party.
“In the parade”, he said, “there were hundreds of young men clamouring for a Second Front.
“I am a bit older than those shouting today about a Second Front, but if I thought intervention by way of a Second Front was necessary, and if I was backing this war up to the hilt, I would see my way to become a member of the British forces to assist it”.
He expressed fears about the outcome of a new front from “the point of view of the mutilation that would take place”, and went on to warn: “If we try to establish a Second Front it will result in not one Dunkirk but many Dunkirks”.
Five well-known Glasgow MPs addressed 30,000 people at the Glasgow Green rally.
A resolution was submitted in which the workers of Glasgow sent greetings to the people of Russia, America and China, with a promise that they would produce, to their utmost, munitions of war “so that 1942 may be the decisive year".
Read more: Herald Diary
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here