THERE'S an old saying: if at first you don't succeed, try, try, and try again. That adage most certainly applies to Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor, one of the most celebrated couples of the 20th century.
Forty-five years ago today, on October 10, 1975, they married in secret in a remote village in Chobe National Park in Botswana. It was the second time the pair had married each other; like the first, it was to end in divorce.
The pair had gained worldwide fame – and notoriety in the eyes of many – when they began their love affair while filming Antony and Cleopatra in 1961. Taylor was already on her fourth marriage, to Eddie Fisher, whom she had "stolen" from Debbie Reynolds in one of the biggest celebrity scandals of the 1950s; she had four children at the time. Burton was married to Welsh actress Sybil Williams, mother of his two children. Their passion for each other was to make the front pages for years to come.
Antony and Cleopatra was finally released in 1963, by which time Burton and Taylor had travelled to Britain to make the Terence Rattigan film The VIPs. They are pictured right on a visit to the Palace of Holyroodhouse in Edinburgh; above, they have ringside seats at the Wembley Arena for the epic fight between Henry Cooper and Cassius Clay.
The pair married for the first time in March, 1964 at the Ritz-Carlton in Montreal. They divorced in June 1974. Their time toghther – and apart – was peppered with fights, splits, reconciliations, bouts of heavy drinking, tantrums and lavish spending – including, most famously, a diamond ring purchased by Burton for $1.5 million.
Burton died of a brain haemorrhage in 1985; Taylor of congestive heart failure in 2011.
Between them, and not counting each other, they had nine spouses. But each had the other in their heart until their dying day. We will likely never see their likes again.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel