THE Covid-19 emergency has impacted all of our lives in ways we could never have imagined. Yet, it is undeniable that its negative effects are impacting those who were already suffering and marginalised more than most.
Our recent Staying Connected report on digital exclusion found that a fifth of the young people and families surveyed did not have the digital devices that they needed, and a third were worried about ongoing costs. We surveyed more than half our service users to help us understand the extent of digital exclusion and what impact it is having on their lives.
What we are finding is that not all our young people have access to the technology they need resulting in an already disadvantaged group becoming potentially even more isolated. As schoolwork is likely to be moving more and more online this already marginalised group is in danger of being left further behind.
READ MORE: Coronavirus: Social care workers twice as likely to die from Covid as colleagues on NHS frontline
Digital exclusion is primarily the result of entrenched poverty. While we welcome the steps the Scottish Government is taking in providing equipment through initiatives like Connecting Scotland, having equipment without the monetary means to stay connected is just another hindrance towards improving vulnerable young people’s lives for the better. As welcome as these initiatives are, the fact remains – we cannot talk about digital exclusion without also talking about the entrenched poverty that fuels it.
What worries me and my colleagues at Includem, with all the noise of Covid-19, are we at risk of further drowning out the voices of those who have been living a daily poverty crisis their whole lives?
Research from the University of Loughbourgh found that rates of child poverty over the last five years have continued to increase in many areas of Scotland. To our collective shame, Glasgow Central has seen the second highest increase in child poverty in the UK, sitting at over 40 per cent in 2019. Over 40%, even before coronavirus.
The Scottish Government and SOLACE, the UK’s leading network for public sector professionals, have produced a report assessing the impact of Covid-19 and its mitigations on vulnerable children. But when it talks about the financial implications, it speaks of “low income families”, or those in “financial distress”. It does not speak of poverty. How can we hope to rid Scotland of poverty if we don’t call it out for what it is?
Another worrying revelation in the report is that referrals to social work are down, despite what many charities are reporting as a marked increase in children and families seeking support. Meanwhile, the number of Child Protection Orders has increased by 38%.
READ MORE: Opinion, Alison Rowat: Too many are suffering, time to get back in business, Scotland
It is apparent that many families are not receiving the holistic support that they need right now. If we have learnt anything from the Independent Care Review, it’s that children and young people who enter the current care system in Scotland feel their voice gets lost; this emergency is only going to exacerbate that.
Of course governments should do everything in their power to help those who have been plunged to financial distress and social isolation because of this pandemic. But we cannot lose sight of those who were experiencing poverty, trauma and social isolation long before coronavirus struck and the need to address the systemic reasons why they find themselves in the position they are in.
Meg Thomas is Head of Programme Design & Policy Management with Includem. Includem is a youth support charity that works with vulnerable young people and families to help improve their life chances.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here