I READ with interest your report "How Labour conned the Big Yin into TV political broadcast " (The Herald, June 11).
The report claims that after Billy Connolly was "conned" by the Labour Party in 1974, he avoided politicians.
That is not entirely correct. At the 1979 General Election, I was defending the most marginal Labour seat in Scotland. My constituency of West Stirlingshire included Drymen, where Billy resided at that time. On the eve of polling day, I received a phone call from the Big Yin himself, offering his services for my campaign. The result was that, on General Election day, Billy and I did a tour of the entire constituency with a loudspeaker mounted on the roof of my car. We stopped at every town and village, where we would get out of the car and do impromptu street meetings. Billy would crack a few jokes and then sign autographs, while I did my best to exhort the assembled masses to exercise their franchise. Billy of course was a much bigger attraction than me, but the formula seemed to work because I was returned to Parliament with the biggest majority in the history of West Stirlingshire.
During the course of that memorable day, I discovered that Billy and I were agreed on most of the big political issues of the day with one notable exception. I was a strong supporter of the campaign for a Scottish Parliament but I failed to persuade Billy on that one. However, I am delighted to see from your report that, more than 40 years later, the Big Yin seems to inch further towards independence than ever before.
Dennis Canavan, Bannockburn.
Praise well received
CREDIT where credit is due, indeed; and both Prince Philip, in terms of his long service, and, yes, Ian W Thomson, in terms of his very fair appreciation of the Duke (Letters, June 11), merit applause.
Mr Thomson and I have, at times, crossed swords (metaphorically speaking, of course), in these pages, with our opposing monarchist views; this time around, I could have put it no better myself. Thank you, Mr Thomson.
Brian D Henderson, Glasgow G42.
X-ray vision
YOUR article on Glasgow's mass X-ray campaign ("Those were the days" Glasgow’s 1957 X-ray crusade", The Herald, June 11) reminded me that when the Glasgow Council were all lined up a passing local worthy was heard to say: "It doesn't take an X-ray to see through that lot."
As it happens, mine failed and had to be redone.
Alasdair Speirs, Barnyards, Fife.
The plot thickens
ALAN Stephen (Letters, June 11), who has taken up jigsaws 70 years on but is being driven up the wall by the last wee piece he cannot find, should check the bottom of his garden. That's where we found our last missing jigsaw piece after the puzzle had sat on the table for two weeks.
Margaret MacDougall, Greenock.
Home truths
RE the article on lie detector tests ("MPS challenge proposals for lie detector tests to monitor terrorist offenders", The Herald, June 10): Many years ago a retired lecturer told me of the following incident at Glasgow University in the early 1900s.
John Glaister, the renowned Professor of Forensic Medicine, was conducting a departmental meeting. A young lecturer suggested that a lie detector recently developed in the United States should be purchased.
Glaister advised a wait and see policy to check if they were reliable and fit for purpose.
Frustrated, the young lecturer asked: “Professor, have you ever seen a lie detector?”
“Seen one?” Glaister replied, “I’ve been married to one for 30 years.”
Iain MacInnes, Glasgow G41.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here