Lynda Graham
The Covid-19 pandemic has thrown a stark light onto the precarious working conditions of visual artists and makers working in Scotland. When lockdown began the Scottish Artists Union were overwhelmed with emails from artists struggling to work out how they are going to pay their bills let alone concentrate on being creative. The emails made for painful reading. However, they came as no surprise to those of us who have been involved in the union for nearly 20 years.
The union has seen artists’ incomes slowly eroded over the years, an already fragile infrastructure wobbling since the 2008 recession. Each year we survey our members which shows that that 83% earn less than £10k per year; 88% do not get contracts consistently; 61% receive less than the industry standard rates of pay; and only 11% regularly receive the industry standard rate of pay; 75% seldom or never receive a fee for exhibitions.
Artists have unusual working lives that rely on a combination of different income streams.
It is a way of working that has been significantly impacted by Covid-19. In the short term there are emergency funds to apply to – but what about the future?
Scotland has a vibrant visual arts culture with talented artists working here and internationally. How has this happened if our artists are so poorly treated? The answer is that creative output only takes place due to “subsidy” – not from the public purse, but from artists themselves. Most artists taking part in exhibitions, workshops, projects in communities put in far more work than they are ever paid for.
SAU members Janie Nicoll and Ailie Rutherford delivered In Kind, a research project focusing on Glasgow International 2018, which concluded that GI generated roughly £1.5m-worth of extra business for the city. However, artists working for nothing contributed around £1.5m of unpaid work.
And 80% of our members are involved in working in schools and communities through workshops, residencies or teaching. All of this work takes time, building meaningful connections, trust and confidence with people often facing disadvantage and exclusion.
If we want to support Scotland’s visual arts community we need to look at new ways of sustaining a professional working life. One idea is Universal Basic Income – a periodic cash allowance given to all citizens to provide them with a standard of living above the poverty line.
SAU are also campaigning with other unions to implement the Fair Work programme which aims to see fair remuneration for work and challenges poor working practices.
UBI does not provide all the answers – it needs to work alongside Fair Work practices, an affordable studio infrastructure, more artists working in socially-engaged settings; more support for makers developing micro business; more mentoring for graduates; an end to insecure teaching contracts and unrealistic workloads; pension support for creatives.
Other countries are leading the way. On Creative Ireland Programme’s Artists Pilot Scheme, artists are permitted one year on unemployment benefit without having to look for work, to allow for time to pursue their practice. They receive £168.50 per week, the equivalent of jobseeker’s allowance in Ireland.
Artists are resourceful, imaginative and passionate about their art practice. We must start valuing them more if we are to safeguard the future of the visual arts and maker community in Scotland. If we want that future to exist we need to start using our imagination, take a leap of faith and start resourcing the sector in a more sustainable way. Giving artists basic security will enable them to flourish and generate even more benefits to our society.
Lynda Graham is president of the Scottish Artists Union
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel