I AGREE with Andy Maciver’s view of the BBC and its future ("If we care about democracy, it’s time to cut BBC’S cord", The Herald, April 16). Mr Maciver outlines the difficulty for newspapers in current times and while I realise that it may be an over-simplification on my part, I have the clear impression that those producing reports on TV and radio are mostly alerted to these stories after newspapers have done the work only to be leap-frogged overnight in reaching the public.
But my stronger agreement with Mr Maciver is that any expectation that the BBC will deliver an unbiased service is a concept from a past age, bearing no resemblance to reality. While the new charter requires the BBC "to raise awareness of different cultures and alternative viewpoints that make up society", it also expects the BBC "to help contribute to the social cohesion of the UK". Given that latter requirement, why should we expect the BBC to be anything other than partial on the constitutional question?
John C Hutchison, Fort William.
ONE has to admire Andy Maciver's candidness and boldness this week in offering his appraisal of two institutions, the NHS and the BBC, widely regarded as among the most important and admired in our society.
While I suspect from the content and tone of his remarks I would have very little, politically and ideologically, in common with Mr Maciver he makes one comment which I do agree with. This concerns the growing tendency of television interviewers to intrude their own views and opinions when asking questions of interviewees. As Mr Maciver's piece points out, this has serious implications for impartiality, especially the BBC's. I have often wondered why this relatively recent practice has developed and can only imagine it has something to do with the gaining of Twitter followers.
Another disturbing tendency is for guests to be introduced and referred to by their forenames. Of course in the 1960s and 70s the astute Harold Wilson turned the tables on the formidable Mr Day by addressing him as "Robin", thus attempting to dilute the searching nature of the great interviewer's questions. This was part of the cut and thrust of the political interview and had no bearing on matters of impartiality.
Brian Harvey, Hamilton.
I HAVE just a couple of questions for Andy Maciver after his article on scrapping the TV licence and cutting the BBC adrift. If I want to watch live football on television at home I am compelled to pay a company like Sky or BT close to £100 per month. In what way is this better than a television licence tax of £12.88 per month? And would Andy Maciver describe Fox New as "plural, modern and vibrant"?
£12.88 per month is a small price to pay for preventing the likes of Rupert Murdoch and his ilk from dominating our press and television.
John Jamieson, Ayr.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel