IAN Lakin (Letters, April 13) asserts that “material change” was a “message” from Nicola Sturgeon. It was not, it was a 2016 manifesto commitment. He conflates the UK debt levels now being attained as part of the viral pandemic, with the topic of Scottish self-government. That debt has to be repaid whether we are a member of the UK or not: that will apply to nearly every advanced economy on the globe. Are all these countries now unable to maintain their independence?
The level of Scottish debt upon independence will also be affected by the nature of the dissolution of the UK, with rUK asserting in 2014 that it would be the “continuator” state: absurdly that Scotland was “extinguished” in 1707 and subsumed in a Greater England. But if rUK did have its way, it would assume all rights, responsibilities and debts of the existing UK, leaving Scotland debt-free. In the years it would take to join the EU, we have time to assess the Norway Option.
It might be helpful to Alan Sutherland (Letters, April 13) to remind him that in the 2015 General Election Scottish Labour lost 40 out of 41 seats, the electorate having a direct say on Scottish Labour's conduct. There was no mention in 2015 of Indyref2, the SNP only asking that the Smith Commission outcome be introduced quickly, along with more devolved responsibilities.
He seems to want Scotland to go back to direct rule from Westminster: the old model abandoned by every political party in Scotland. Really, how would they man up their departments with Scottish MPs when they have so few?
Mr Sutherland and the tiny band of These Islands adherents will be alone on this one.
GR Weir, Ochiltree.
STRUAN Stevenson ("Coronavirus is a danger to democracy as well as lives", The Herald, April 11) attempts, none too subtly, to link the proposal to suspend jury trials (ill thought-out and now happily binned) to the activities of Viktor Orban (Hungary) and, to Adolf Hitler no less.
It is a pity that he could not find space to refer to one of the first actions of his leader upon taking office: the attempted prorogation of the UK Parliament.
John Boyle, Ardrossan.
I KNOW that some politicians can happily switch principles to suit different discussions, but I was pleased to see a consistent theme in Struan Stevenson’s warning about taking away freedoms by creating diversionary scare stories. His conclusion that there is “a tipping point beyond which we must not go in the name of safety” is founded upon Benjamin Franklin’s famous assertion that “they that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety deserve neither liberty nor safety”.
I will take courage from that the next time someone tries to convince me that it would be foolhardy for Scotland to become independent rather than staying safely subsidised by the Barnett Formula.
Christopher Keegan, Glasgow G69.
RUTH Marr (Letters, April 10) states: "It’s important that Scottish voters are not distracted by any more smoke and mirrors fudge, no more false vows and empty promises. That is rich coming from a nationalist whose Government has served us nothing but a diet of the foregoing and whose record is nothing short of abysmal.
Jim Mitchell, Carluke.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel