REPLYING to my letter of February 5, Jim Sillars (Letters, February 6) accuses me of the "old trick" of attacking what he did not write about, but in stating that in his original letter he "made no mention of an EU role in the damaging domestic policies of UK governments, because it had none" and that the EU did not stop the UK from holding the 2016 referendum "as it had no power to do so" he makes exactly the point I was making. Mr Sillars famously commented that "Scotland must be the only country in the world to discover oil and get poorer"; the EU can't be blamed for that either.
Mr Sillars is of course entitled to his views about the EU, but whatever its faults, and I don't deny it has them, the fact remains that 62 per cent of Scots voters at the EU referendum backed staying within the European Union, and at December's General Election the SNP won 48 out of Scotland's 59 seats; indeed, if you lump in the LibDems' four seats and Labour's one, all of Scotland's MPs support the EU, apart from Boris Johnson's six Tories. I am sorry that, on this issue, Mr Sillars appears to be on the same page as Mr Johnson.
Ruth Marr, Stirling.
WOULD it be possible for SNP MPs, and MSPs to give us a break for a few weeks from their whingeing and moaning about how Scotland is being downtrodden by Westminster? Even one week without the negative, miserable and false narrative would come as a relief. However, I doubt that this is possible. Girning seems to be their default setting.
William Loneskie, Lauder.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here