With columnists looking back over 2019, there is a mood to assess the impact of the big stories of the year, and indeed, the decade.
The Sunday Times
Rosamund Urwin looks back at the #MeToo campaign which began in the entertainment industry but became a wider movement against sexual harassment. But looking forward, she sees it facing its biggest challenge when Weinstein goes on trial for rape in January.
“If Weinstein walks, a wave of female fury will engulf the Western World” she says. “His trial will reignite the great unresolved debate of #MeToo: How much has really changed since October 2017 when those first allegations against Weinstein emerged?”
The movie producer himself shows little sign of remorse, she says having boasted about his role in promoting women directors and films about women, in an interview with the New York Post. “Following what Weinstein’s representatives have claimed was a period of reflection, he is still snorting lines of that most potent drug, self-delusion,” she says.
The Sunday Telegraph
It has been a decade of self-delusion, according to Julie Burchill, who has little time for mindfulness and self-care. These she says have “a more sinister side in no-platforming, trigger warnings and t he belief of a sizeable number of students that they’re not at university in order to grapple with conflicting ideas, but to find a safe space in a soft-toy playpen.” The cure, she believes, is stoicism as an antidote to virtue-signalling. “Stoics say leave a situation, change it or stop complaining about it; this was the decade in which we Brexiteers did the first, and now it’s time for the side that lost to do the last one, having given the second a damn good go.”
Scotland on Sunday
“Unfortunately there are no knighthoods for stoicism”, says Dani Garavelli, reflecting that if there were they should go to some of those shown in the Channel 4 documentary Growing Up Poor: Britain’s Breadline Kids, which she lauds as one of the best of 2019.
Instead such gongs go to the likes of Iain Duncan Smith, she says. But the former Work and Pensions Secretary is responsible for the plight of the programme’s participants: “Iain Duncan Smith’s welfare reforms were the dark heart of Growing Up Poor... His elevation further undermines an already discredited honours system. But it is entirely in tune with today’s politics; cruelty and incompetence rewarded by a self promoting clique, while those working long hours to improve people’s lives might as well be invisible.
“That’s the way it goes nowadays. Those who sow chaos and confusion are glorified, while those left to pick up the pieces of their own and other people’s lives remain in the shadows.”
The Sunday Mail
On a lighter note, Lesley Roberts casts an eye over 2019’s winners and losers – or as she has it the end-of-year ‘party poppers’ and ‘party poopers’. The former include Scots singer Lewis Capaldi and bakery chain Greggs, with the successful launch of its vegan sausage roll. “Who would have thought the makers of meaty treats like the Steak Bake and the Sausage, Bean and Cheese Melt would be so in tune with the plant-based diet craze”.
Her ‘losers’ include – inevitably – Jeremy Corbyn and also the Sussexes, Meghan and Harry, criticised for secrecy over the birth of baby Archie, and travelling in jets while “lecturing” about the climate. “Just when it seemed they’d turned the negative publicity around with a successful tour of southern Africa, they took the opportunity to bleat about how difficult their privileged lives are,” Roberts says. “They’d better recruit a new PR team for 2020. Make sure it’s not Prince Andrew’s.”
The Sunday Post
Former BBC royal correspondent Jennie Bond is also thinking about the Windsors, and what the Queen might have meant in referring to the year as ‘quite bumpy’ in her Christmas message. Prince Andrew and the Epstein scandal (“far from over”) are an obstacle to a smoother year, she says. Prince Philip’s health is a concern, and Harry and Meghan are “still on the warpath against the press”. “There is no doubt the royal family have some ground to make up in 2020,” she concludes.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here