THE starting gun had barely been fired on the December election before there was an appeal that the NHS should not be used as a "political weapon".
This was closely followed by the parties wading in with overheated promises to outspend their rivals on health, and dubious vows that a vote for them was the only way to save the NHS.
Firstly, it is impossible for an institution that absorbs as much taxpayer funding as the NHS - the single biggest public sector spend - to avoid becoming a political football in an election campaign.
READ MORE: Child cancer patient 'died with infection' while being treated at Glasgow's children's hospital
What would be better, however, is if any of the politicians were really grasping the issues that are causing the greatest harm to the health service and coming up with genuinely radical solutions.
Throwing money at it is only part of the fix, although the sustained underinvestment of the past decade must be reversed - and urgently.
The latest OECD report, published on November 7, found that the UK was spending 9.8 per cent of GDP on health, compared to 11.2% in France and Germany.
We have 2.8 doctors and 2.5 hospital beds per 1000 people compared to 4.3 and eight, respectively, in Germany.
We also have one of the lowest rates of MRI and CT scanners in the OECD - only Colombia, Costa Rica, Hungary and Mexico have fewer. The UK had nine CT scanners and seven MRI units per million people in 2017, compared to 65 and 14 respectively in Australia.
For all the talk of "record spending" on the NHS, in real-terms the NHS budget grew by just 1.5% a year on average between 2009/10 to 2018/19, compared to an overall annual average in the lifetime of the NHS of 3.7%.
If resources appear squeezed, that is why. But there have to be priorities beyond just increasing the budget.
Number one should be an end to the disastrous pensions policy which is already wreaking havoc by driving senior clinicians to retire earlier than planned or shun extra work designed to cut waiting times because doing so puts them at risk of ludicrously high tax bills.
READ MORE: Royal College of Surgeons boss ousted in vote of no confidence
It cannot possibly be rational for the Treasury or beneficial to patients to charge doctors more in taxes than they ever earned from their overtime.
Proposals for a 'flexible' alternative do not go far enough and, on this, the next incumbent of Number 10 must listen to the profession.
Secondly, politicians need to look beyond pouring money into hospitals and give general practice and social care a bigger share of the pot.
It is a lot less glamorous, but it would do more to cut A&E overcrowding and bed blocking than almost any other initiative.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel