THE recent passing of businessman Alan Stuart at the age of 88 brought to mind the audacious theft of the Stone of Destiny from Westminster Abbey on Christmas Day, 1950.
Mr Stuart was one of the quartet that made headlines with the deed. The others were, of course, Ian Hamilton, Kay Matheson and Gavin Vernon. The photograph shows, from left, Vernon, Hamilton and Stuart.
It was taken on April 1951, just after the House of Commons had been informed by Sir Hartley Shawcross, the Attorney-General, that he did not think that the public interest required that he should order criminal action to be taken against the culprits. He had, he said., no desire to create ‘martyrs’ or ‘heroes’, though he did describe the affair as ‘deplorable’, entailing ‘vulgar acts of vandalism’ that had caused ‘great distress in England and Scotland’.
As the Glasgow Herald reported, Hamilton, Vernon and Stuart, who were then aged between 20 and 25, took the step, after learning of the Attorney-General’s decision, to identify themselves as the people who had removed the stone and spirited it north of the border.
“A girl was with them in London at the time, they said last night,” the Herald report continued. “Later, speaking by telephone from Kyle of Lochalsh, Miss Kay Matheson (22), a domestic science teacher, said she had accompanied the students.” The three men made their announcement at Glasgow University Union.
A Herald leading article the following day said the whole episode had to be deplored, but that Sir Hartley’s decision was a wise one “in view of the circumstances surrounding the incident, which has already had more public attention than it deserved.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here