VACCINATION is one of science’s modern miracles, drastically reducing the number of people becoming seriously ill, disabled or dying from contagious diseases.
As was evident in 1999, when Andrew Wakefield published his inaccurate study on the MMR jab’s link to autism, any sort of doubts regarding vaccination can have an instant and detrimental effect on their uptake.
In the age of the internet and social media, it is frightening to see the rising number of pages and sites dedicated to promoting myths about the dangers of vaccination. Some even compare immunisation to child abuse.
What could be considered more dangerous to children, and not just our own, is not having them immunised. Herd immunity, whereby those who are unvaccinated or have lowered immune systems are protected by those who have received jabs, is an essential part of public health. Without it, diseases spread like wildfire.
These stark warnings from healthcare professionals are not simply scare stories. Take a look at England and Wales, where more than 900 confirmed cases of measles were registered last year – a disease that was nearly eradicated in the UK in 2016.
- Removing benefits and a £500 fine: The countries forcing a fight back against measles
In some countries children and their parents are crying out for vaccinations but have simply no means to afford them or to access them. We should be thankful and grateful that we live in a country that puts healthcare on top of the priority list and provides these life-saving treatments to all. It is now imperative that the public shun the social media scare-tactics and listen to science, before we have a real crisis on our hands.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here