UK politics may be unpredictable, but Theresa May’s resignation was one outcome most voters could have foreseen.
May failed on several occasions to persuade MPs to back her Brexit withdrawal plan and she fast became a lame-duck leader.
Her hardline colleagues, who hated aspects of her Brexit proposal, refused to budge, while Labour saw the dangers of doing a deal with a political dodo. It’s amazing she lasted this long.
May’s departure looks like it will lead to Boris Johnson becoming Tory Prime Minister, a development that will please Conservative party members, but will doubtless leave many ordinary voters fearing for the future.
In interviews this week, Johnson put a no-deal Brexit firmly back on the table.
Though he (or whoever wins) will face the same Brexit problems as May in this paralysed parliament, and though we can be fairly hopeful that MPs will never endorse the sort of hard Brexit he has been talking about, it does stick in the throat that this power will be inherited by a politician whose mandate has gone untested before the electorate.
Theresa May was handed the premiership (though she did go to the country, for purely selfish reasons) and has led us to this point, stuck to her redlines, abandoned compromise and ignored the devolved nations.
Now, when Boris (or whoever wins) does walk into Number 10, it will be thanks to Tory members, not voters.
At this time in the Brexit process, when so much is at stake, this situation must surely not be tolerated again. Surely it is time to hold a General Election.
Whoever wins the Tory leadership contest should present their plans for the country – and for Brexit – and give the people their say.
Voters may be fatigued, but it is time for US to decide.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel