PRETTY soon, they’d have the Cuban missile crisis to worry about, but at the beginning of October 1962, what was most vexing ordinary people was a national one-day rail strike.
Transport Minister Ernest Marples had tried and failed to avert it, and with overnight long-distance trains cancelled, main-line termini in Glasgow, Edinburgh, London and other cities were almost deserted on October 3.
Police and the motoring organisations made elaborate preparations to cope with the extra traffic expected on the nation’s roads. In Glasgow (including Jamaica Bridge, pictured here) as elsewhere, the traffic flowed smoothly. “I’m happy enough,” mused one Glaswegian taxi driver. “We should be busier than ever.”
The strike involved 317,000 railway workers. Marples had arranged a meeting between the British Transport Commission chairman Dr Richard Beeching and rail unions, which were demanding to know the extent of the Commission’s consultation with workers over its policies for streamlining the railways. The meeting broke up without any positive results.
The Pedal Club, a club of cycling officials, said that workers could cycle 10 miles to work in little more than an hour, and that one million bikes were currently lying idle.
The strike achieved a complete stoppage of trains, apart from a few London Tube services driven by non-NUR members.
Read more:
Herald DiaryFive months later, in March 1963, the Beeching report, by British Rail chairman Dr Beeching, proposed a far-reaching reshaping of the country’s rail network.
The report, in the later judgement of The Oxford Companion to Twentieth Century British Politics, was “challenging but statistically fragile.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here