THE Scottish Secretary of State, Bruce Millan, had just announced that £120 million was to be spent in Glasgow’s inner East End. It was, Rev Peter W Millar wrote to this newspaper, “a tremendous encouragement in the present economic climate that such massive aid is to come to this area of large-scale deprivation.”
The minister at Dalmarnock Parish Church said a major report on Dalmarnock, written by local residents, spelt out clearly, “what it is like to live in an area where, in addition to all the complex human and social problems, the basic necessities of life - such as decent housing, shops and adequate community facilities - are in short supply.”
Mr Miller’s letter, which was accompanied by the picture on the right, said there had been a “total lack of consultation” in every part of the East End between local people and the local authority. “On almost every major decision affecting the community in recent times - especially with regard to the widespread demolition programme and the consequent dispersal of hundreds of families - the people living within the area have had no involvement whatsoever. In the light of this, it is not surprising that community depression is at an all-time high - a feeling which is exacerbated by the terrible physical conditions which prevail throughout the area.”
What Eastenders now wanted to know was, would there be “genuine consultation” between the Scottish Development Agency and local communities on the spending of the £120 million?
If not, then not even £1000 million would save the area from “that feeling of neglect and lack of self-worth” which people had accepted for too long “and which lies at the very root of all kinds of other human deprivation,” Mr Millar wrote.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here