THE trial in the Spanish Supreme Court against the leaders of the Catalan independence movement has much more to do with an act of faith than with a 21st century trial in a developed, democratic country in which citizens’ rights are respected.
In a performance more properly belonging to the 16th century, the court ignores pieces of evidence when taking testimony, claiming that all documentary evidence will be seen at once at a later date. Witnesses to the prosecution may lie with the consent of the judges, and the defence is prevented from showing contrasting statements with documents, in paper format or images, videos, and other media relevant in our times.
Only after two or three months, images showing the falsehood of the witnesses will be allowed to be shown. So, will the court open proceedings against false witnesses? Perhaps in a reality parallel to that of the Spanish state; in the present framework, surely not.
The trial is not about laws, regulations and infringements. Behind the figures of the magistrates, there is a state that wants to crush any fundamental dissidents who question the post-Franco regime born after the dictator’s death. Above all, there is the State itself, which was unable to find a single one of the more than 6,000 ballot boxes that Catalan citizens brought into the country – a state mocked by the citizens in its capacity for self-organization, a fundamental fact for understanding the vote on the day of the referendum in spite of brutal repression.
The Spanish state has become vindictive. It comes down hard on those who want Catalan independence but soon democracy in Spain will be nothing more than a hologram to look good before the international community.
Manuel Perez Nespereira,
Sant Fructuos 10, Barcelona.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here