Seven days.
That is all that remains of the two years that the UK had to negotiate a Brexit deal and yet the only thing we have to show for it is a short extension of the Article 50 process that seems to offer little prospect of a solution.
In her address to the nation this week, the Prime Minister said the fault for the situation lay with MPs, but no one is buying that one.
The blame for this chaotic, farcical and humiliating crisis lies not with MPs but with Theresa May.
She has been the architect of this shameful impasse and she continues to show none of the skills required to get us out of it.
Sadly, the signs that the Prime Minister was not the right person for the job were there right from the start two years ago.
When she triggered Article 50 in March 2017, Mrs May said the aim was to deliver Brexit in an orderly manner; she also said she wanted to give British citizens and businesses as much certainty as early as possible.
However, instead of searching for a deal that could win support from MPs, she laid down rigid red lines that ruled out membership of the customs union and the single market.
Not only did this make it impossible for Labour and the SNP to support her, it also led to the creation of the backstop which alienated the DUP and the ERG as well.
In other words, a compromise within the red lines was always unlikely and instead of certainty, we had doubt, and instead of an orderly withdrawal, we had chaos.
Does the extension of Article 50 to May 22 outlined by the European Union solve any of these problems?
It looks unlikely. The extension comes with a condition – MPs must support the withdrawal agreement at the third time of asking – and the French president Emmanuel Macron has warned that if they do not support it, the UK will leave without a deal.
The problem is that, thanks to Mrs May’s clumsy and counter-productive attempt to blame them for the mess, MPs are in an even more rebellious mood and the prospect of Parliament supporting the deal seems more remote than ever.
The hardest Brexiters also no longer have any incentive to support the deal and may begin to see this as their chance to get what they have always wanted: no deal.
Many voters watching the situation unfold this week have responded by signing the petition calling for Article 50 to be revoked and it has already attracted more than a million signatures.
However, such a move would require another major game-changing event first. For instance, could the Commons take control and seek to revoke Article 50?
A change of government or a second referendum might also pave the way to staying in the EU after all.
The question is: would a second referendum be the best way forward?
It would take weeks to organise and would require a longer extension of Article 50, but in the face of a Government and Parliament that cannot find a solution, thanks partly to weak leadership from Labour, and as the chances of Mrs May’s deal winning support slip further away, a second referendum is looking increasingly like the only persuasive way to break the impasse.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel