IT is no surprise to see dog owners responding to criticism of their peer group (Letters, February 5). They are possibly the most entitled group in society; woe betide anyone criticising them, or their dogs.
However, the fact remains that many owners/walkers do not clean up after their dogs. As someone who regularly exercises in my local park, I often have to avoid dog dirt, or discarded bags of the stuff. Of course, part of the problem is, that as soon as walkers enter the park, they let their dogs off the leash. So, when it wanders off, out of sight of the walker, it’s no surprise any mess it makes is missed or conveniently ignored.
As for comparisons with people who litter: whilst this is equally as bad as those who refuse to clean up after their dog, litter is generally less problematic, as it is easily cleared up; doesn’t adhere readily to shoes or clothing; stink, or contain toxic parasites.
Stuart Brennan,
37 Netherburn Avenue, Glasgow.
I AM disappointed in David Stubley's suggestion (Letters, February 5) that I was economical with the truth regarding dog walkers’ behaviour in my letter of February 2. I do not engage in apocryphal tales. I tell it as I see it. I agree on one salient point: It is the conduct of the few (dog handlers) who trespass, otherwise the problem would be even more visible.
Allan C Steele,
22 Forres Avenue, Giffnock.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel