By Malcolm Todd, Waste management expert and former managing director of Shore Recycling Ltd
IF 2018 was best described as “a year of uncertainty”, then 2019 should be ‘a year of urgency’.
Don’t worry, this isn’t yet another Brexit diatribe. In many ways it’s more important than that. Political structures come and go, but resources, economics and landscapes don’t.
Mindful of Scotland’s natural resources, unique beauty, and economic challenges, the Scottish Government has set out signposts for energy sourcing, climate change and the need for what is known as the “circular economy”. That is when we keep resources in use for as long as possible, then recover and regenerate products and materials at the end of their life.
Unfortunately, the direction of travel along the path from strategy to action is not quick enough.
We all watched in awe and horror as the Blue Planet II TV series showed us the impact of our attitudes towards plastics.
But individual action isn’t enough; we need strong leadership to address and tackle the obstacles to converting strategies in to sustainability.
There are some huge challenges on the horizon. Central to this is our attitude to – and treatment of – waste and energy.
A ban on biodegradable domestic waste going to landfill comes into force in Scotland in January 2021 as part of the Scottish Government’s climate change strategy. Yet we are still putting 45 per cent of our domestic waste into holes in the ground – so that’s one million tonnes needing an alternative home within the next two years.
That’s why 2019 must be a year of urgency.
Yes, we can – and must – recycle more. But the rate of recycling has plateaued in recent years, so it cannot be expected to solve this scale of problem in time.
We could choose to continue to export the waste, or should I say, export the problem.
In 2016 Scotland exported 1.6million tonnes of waste. Half of it went elsewhere in the UK, 43 per cent to the EU (and who knows if that will continue to be open to us), with the remainder going directly to far-flung places globally.
It is all exported in accordance with regulations and protocols, but it doesn’t make moral or economic sense to pay to ship and dispose of waste that should be dealt with at home.
To sustainably plug this gap, we need to start treating waste as a valuable resource – and not simply an inconvenient cost. Our European neighbours take in UK waste because they have embraced the generation of heat and power from waste – as well as enjoying the revenues that our country pays them.
England has also woken up to the contribution made by waste-to-energy plants, which gasify waste to generate fuel. This is residual waste, left over after all practicable recycling has taken place, turned into an asset we use at home.
There is much talk by all political persuasions about the circular economy, but currently we seem to have limited our short-term ambitions to worthy schemes like plastic bottle deposit schemes. Waste-to-energy plans are the circular economy in real action.
An urgent sustainable plan is needed so that landfill diversion by 2021 becomes a reality and not a last-minute panic. By integrating this with the plans of the recovery energy sector, we can have a solution before it becomes a problem.
Yes, large-scale energy schemes are costly and take a long time to come to fruition. But with political will, and existing private business commitment, this can become a reality in time.
If we fail to take urgent action now, it will be too late.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here