INEQUALITY has been a much deplored but ever deepening hallmark of life in recent years. It pervades all aspects of our society, most notably in income, but also in rights, opportunities and even life expectancy by geographical area. Now, we learn that it even applies towards the end of life, when advanced dementia sufferers are treated differently from those with other terminal illnesses. The problem for dementia sufferers is that their care is complicated by being delivered through multiple providers. In Scotland, this is generally divided into two: health care and social care. The former is free, the latter subject to charges.
Dementia generally comes under the category of social care, even when health care is needed due to the inevitable physical problems that arise as the condition progresses. As a result, reports Alzheimer Scotland’s Fair Care Dementia Care Commission, advanced dementia sufferers in Scotland are paying an estimated £50.9 million a year in social care charges.
As if that weren’t enough, not only does this put them on an unequal footing compared to other unfortunates with terminal illnesses, but the amounts that have to be paid vary according to the policies their local authority charges, particularly for social care at home. In one case that Alzheimer Scotland highlights, we see decent, caring, dutiful people financially hammered for looking after a loved one, and only securing health care after pushing for it. This is clearly unacceptable.
Alzheimer Scotland wants the Scottish Government to investigate the costs of providing free health care for those with advanced dementia. This is a reasonable demand. Even if we cannot expect Holyrood to wave a magic wand to cover the cost, there is a clear need to have its experts explore possible solutions.
Dementia, we accept, is complicated. But that is no reason for advanced dementia sufferers and their families to be treated inequitably. There is enough inequality around, without it extending to the latter stages of life.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here