CHANGING the clocks is a topic that seems to come up every year at some point (Letters, January 2, 4 & 5). I would like to extend sympathy to all who suffer from seasonal affective disorder (Sad), especially at this, the darkest time of the year.
It is a distressing condition, though there can be some amelioration from ensuring brightly lit environments in frequented buildings. I agree about the further disruption caused by the change from British Standard Time (BST) to Greenwich Mean Time (GMT) as nature’s more gradual approach would be more tolerable for Sad sufferers. The time change is also disruptive for shift work, transport timetables and animal husbandry (to mention just three examples) and is unnecessary. However, all-year BST does not work well for Scotland and we would be better to stick with GMT; we would still have long summer days.
We need to consider not only our latitudinal position but also longitude. These factors determine how much daylight is received, exacerbated in winter at times by heavily overcast skies. Mankind’s puny efforts to change things by altering our clocks never work, except by shifting peak darkness from one end of the day to the other.
There are compensations for many of us; there is nothing so comfortable as snuggling up with a good book (am I giving away my age?) or listening to music, with curtains drawn and a howling gale outside.
On dark mornings there may be a chance to see the wonder of nocturnal creatures, finishing their night’s work; only recently I came across a pair of adolescent roe deer and also a large dog fox, walking casually up our road. Leave our clocks on GMT.
Andrew McCrae,
35 St. Andrews Drive, Gourock.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here