By Dr John Crichton, Chair, Royal College of Psychiatrists in Scotland
BEFORE starting my medical training I worked as an auxiliary nurse in mental health for those months between the end of exams and the start of the university year. That experience shaped my career. It revealed to me the stark reality that quality of patient care depends on having the right number and skill mix of staff. Within the medical profession generally there is widespread concern that levels of medical staffing have fallen to dangerously low levels. The Francis Report into incidents at the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust highlighted the importance of adequate numbers of staff in assuring safe patient care.
Mental health has never before enjoyed such a positive profile or this degree of cross-party support. The Scottish Government’s Programme for Government highlights the importance of prevention. The support for child and adolescent mental health services is to be welcomed, as is promised investment. More people are coming forward for help with their mental health and that is a good thing, but we need the staff available to be able to meet that expectation. We have a visionary strategy for mental health but unless we achieve the right balance in our NHS workforce, we risk missing this opportunity. Promotion of mental wellbeing is not simply the province of mental health specialists but of everyone. There is a vital role for registered nurses working in schools, as health visitors and in primary care. To make sure we have the workforce to meet the demands for mental health support, action is needed now.
Scotland has a high vacancy rate in mental health nursing, currently 4.5 per cent, in line with the high vacancy rate across the nursing workforce generally. There are 438 whole time equivalent mental health nursing vacancies across Scotland. One in three nurses will retire in the next10 years.
Vacancy rates in psychiatry are even higher. For the period ending June 2018, the figure was 10.5 per cent, with 7.0 per cent of posts vacant for six months.
Inadequate staffing creates a negative spiral with staff moving elsewhere or being lost to their profession. Those dedicated staff who work to temporarily keep services going can never be a substitute for permanent staff who can mould and shape a service.
This challenge was illustrated in the Royal College of Nursing’s Safe Staffing Survey, published in September 2017. The survey asked RCN members across the UK about their last shift or day worked in health or social care. Of the 1,300 shifts in in-patient mental health wards, respondents noted that a third had a shortfall of registered nurses. A fifth of shifts had temporary staff and nearly half of healthcare support workers in mental health in-patient settings were temporary.
Put simply, when properly staffed, we see improved patient outcomes, reduced mortality rates, and the quality of patient care improves. Conversely, insufficient numbers bring low morale, high staff turnover, and potentially life-threatening consequences for patients.
The Health and Care (Staffing) (Scotland) Bill debated in the Scottish Parliament last week is a potential lever to ensure the provision of safe and effective care. The Bill as introduced is a good foundation but it will be important to take advantage of opportunities to see it strengthened as it moves through parliament, if the legislation is going to make a real difference for staff and patients. This is work I know the Royal College of Nursing is actively engaged with.
Bolstering the legal baseline for safe staffing is a great start but we also need a wholesale change of approach to the recruitment, support and retention of nurses, doctors and allied health professionals.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel