IN your report (“Pride of the Clyde”, The Herald, December 1) it is stated that the QE2 has “70,327 tonnes weight”. This is wrong.
It is true that records show the QE2 as having a gross tonnage which ranged from 65,863 to 70,327 during her seagoing career but, in maritime circles, gross tonnage is not a measure of weight. It is, rather, a measure of internal volume which originally equated 100 cubic feet to one ton. Since 1969, gross tonnage has been a pure number derived from a formula based on the logarithm of the internal volume in cubic metres.
The weight of a ship is represented by its displacement from Archimedes’ Principle : “a floating body displaces its own weight of fluid”. In the case of the QE2, the displacement during the trials of December 1968 was 49,444 tons (Imperial tons of 2240 pounds each) at a mean draught of 29ft 8ins.
At the full load draught of 32ft, the displacement would be about 54,000 tons. You can see the extent of the exaggeration of the weight, which concerns me.
For a number of historical reasons a ship’s gross tonnage, which may remain constant for many years, is well publicised and publicly available while displacement, which varies from day to day as fuel, stores, passengers and/or cargo come and go, is neither publicised nor publicly available – except for naval ships
I did not have the pleasure of sailing on the QE2 but the article did remind me of a Saturday visit to Clydebank, 50 years ago, arranged by Glasgow University Engineers Society, to see and tour the ship shortly before her departure for trials. I still remember being impressed by the depth of the pile on the carpets.
David L Smith,
4 Abercorn Road,
Newton Mearns, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel