IT takes a real sense of frustration for women providing vital – but low-paid – services to come out on strike. Sympathy for the caterers, carers and cleaners of Glasgow City Council in their struggle for equal pay is widespread, and persists even when the dispute is dogged by a perception that the women’s frustration is being manipulated for political ends.
Why there is a strike now, after the advent of an SNP administration trying to sort the problem, while there was none previously under Labour – when it was brushed under the carpet – is on the face of it difficult to understand. For many, the plot only thickens when they learn of close links between GMB officials and Labour.
Scottish Labour leader Richard Leonard’s expression of solidarity with the women yesterday brought forth a withering response from First Minister Nicola Sturgeon who, normally measured in her language, expressed clearly angry “contempt” for Labour on the issue. The council’s SNP leader Susan Aitken, meanwhile, confessed bewilderment about the strike. Her administration, she said, had “grasped the nettle” of equal pay. Well, now she’s being stung by it.
Regardless of all the political shenanigans, the women’s frustration has been fuelled by the painfully slow progress made on the issue by the SNP administration. Ten months of talks and 21 meetings have led to little progress, which inevitably casts doubt about any sense of urgency surrounding the issue.
No one doubts the sincerity of women’s rights supporter Ms Aitken. And, doubtless it takes two to delay. Lawyers representing the women have made added – but reasonable – demands on matters such as pensions. A 30-strong team of council officials is on the case. And, while it might be unfair to assert that neither council officials nor lawyers have a reputation for haste, it is clear that stronger political will must be asserted to get this business sorted. As matters stand, the nettle is still standing.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here