One of the many questions those involved in the blighted refurbishment of the "Mack" – the destroyed Glasgow School of Art building – are refusing to answer is why a cheaper and flammable insulation was used and not one which would not burn. From their silence we may draw our own conclusions.
The GSA trustees and director have placed their own brand of omerta, the mafia code of silence, on everyone and anyone who had the slightest involvement or knowledge of the the fire which destroyed Glasgow's precious jewel. This was not a privately-owned building with commercial secrets or data to protect. It was paid for by all of us, as are the director and staff. With their refusal to answer they display a breathtaking contempt, not just for the media, but the general public in what was – for the second time – a preventable disaster.
There is no rush to judgment over the cause of the fire, it is proper that the investigating authorities are given time to discover it, as they will do. But enforced silence must not be allowed to protect those who should be taking responsibility and have manifestly failed to do so. After an initial burst of concern politicians have also appeared to slump into an unspoken agreement that the same people who were not held to account in the 2014 fire can escape once more. There must be a thorough-going inquiry, led from Holyrood, into one of the great and avoidable tragedies of our times.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel