THE Catholic Church in Scotland found itself between a rock and a hard place regarding the funeral arrangements for shamed former Cardinal Keith O’Brien.
This was not an unforeseen problem. In 2013, as a result of sexual misconduct allegations – and Cardinal O’Brien’s subsequent admission that his behaviour fell short of the standard expected of a priest, archbishop and cardinal – he had been forced to give up the rights and duties which attached to his title.
Read more: O'Brien funeral to be in England
At the time, there were questions about what role he would continue to have, if any, and where he would live in retirement. But the Herald also flagged up a dilemma ahead for the the Church.
Having risen to the highest echelons of the church, upon his death Cardinal O’Brien could have expected the same ceremony afforded other archbishops and cardinals.
That includes a funeral mass in his own diocese, in this case St Andrews and Edinburgh, of which he was archbishop until 2013. The expectation would be that a requiem mass would be presided over by his successor, Archbishop Leo Cushley, and that he would subsequently be laid to rest in St Mary’s Cathedral.
But Cardinal O’Brien was accused of abusing his position to make advances on subordinate priests. He was also guilty of considerable hypocrisy, having had a long-standing affair with another man while preaching of the immorality of homosexuality and opposing gay marriage.
For his victims and indeed others who have been abused at the hands of priests, to have afforded him the kind of ceremony usually associated with the passing of a cardinal would have been a further insult.
Read more: O'Brien funeral to be in England
Recognising the sensitivity, when Cardinal O’Brien’s death was announced on Monday, the diocese immediately said the Holy See and Pope Francis himself would consult with his family and with Archbishop of Westminster Cardinal Vincent Nicholls to determine the best course.
The suggestion by sources in the Diocese that the funeral would be in keeping with the manner of his later life was an early indication that Cardinal O’Brien would not be laid to rest with the full ceremonial trappings usually accorded to those of his standing in the Church.
In holding a requiem mass for him in Newcastle, and a burial alongside his parents in Mount Vernon Cemetery in Edinburgh, it appears a reasonable balance has been struck.
Some will see it as a snub that his funeral mass will not be held in St Mary’s Cathedral, nor even elsewhere in the diocese. There are already mutterings that internal politics have influenced the decision. Some of those who knew Cardinal O’Brien say that he would have still expected to be laid to rest in St Mary’s.
The church says differently. It is certainly credible that, given the circumstances, he would have chosen to be buried with his mother and father. His brother and the executor of his will were party to the decision.
Meanwhile, by appointing a Cardinal to oversee the funeral of a fellow Cardinal, Keith O’Brien’s status is arguably being suitably honoured.
Given the extent to which his reputation had been tarnished, and to which his behaviour had tarnished that of the church, it was always hard to imagine Cardinal O’Brien having being laid to rest with full ceremonial honours.
The solution reached by those involved has balanced a course which appears to be the least offensive outcome for all those affected.
Within a Church founded on the principle that all of us are sinners, and the final judgement is not one for man to make, a quiet, respectful, Christian burial, is the right decision for all concerned.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel