By Steph Scholten, Director of The Hunterian, University of Glasgow
THIS year sees the 300th anniversary of the birth of William Hunter, founder of the Hunterian Museum at the University of Glasgow. As its latest director, coming from The Netherlands with almost 30 years of international museum experience, I would like to share some of my reflections on the Scottish museum landscape six months into post.
My first and strongest impression is the emphasis on museums as social institutions. Museums should be democratic and accessible or not exist at all. In Glasgow, since the Burrell Collection opened in 1983, this is particularly strong; museums are approached as instruments for reviving a struggling city and its communities. And arguably, successfully. Footfall is high and well-distributed across the population, certainly compared to other European countries.
Free access makes the “business model” of museums strongly dependent on public funding. Nowhere is this more relevant than in university museums. Scotland is blessed with several, many recognised as of national significance. The Hunterian is by far the largest. University museums have to cater to a mixture of student, academic, special interest and general public audiences. In recent years, the widening access element has become more important.
The remit for The Hunterian is a case in point: to serve academic communities by supporting teaching and research using the collections; to share and validate their outputs; and to represent the university as an institution to wider audiences. The Hunterian is possibly best positioned of all Scottish, and most UK, university museums to deliver this. It is the oldest public museum in Scotland (dating from 1807), and draws substantial audiences to its public venues – in 2017 it broke the 200,000 mark for the first time. It has vast encyclopaedic collections. Based on my years of professional experience, I can claim that Glasgow and Scotland have in The Hunterian something truly world-class.
The Hunterian is in an exciting phase of its development: almost exactly a year ago, the new Hunterian Collections Study Centre was opened in the Kelvin Hall, itself an icon of Scottish culture. It is a truly special facility that transforms the ways in which the 1.5 million objects in its collections can be made accessible to ever-widening audiences. In its first year, there has already been substantial use of the facilities and many national and international colleagues have been amazed by the scale and quality of our laboratories, research and study rooms. The Hunterian has developed outreach links to younger audiences, a crucial pointer to the future. If museums and universities are to be living entities, they need to provide access for the students and academics of tomorrow.
I have been recruited to play a substantial role in what comes next: to move the public displays of The Hunterian into Kelvin Hall as well, and to create, with partners such as Glasgow Museums, Glasgow Life and the National Galleries of Scotland, a completely new, 21st century museum experience that will enhance the attraction of this city to its (inter)national audiences and, of course, showcase The Hunterian and the University of Glasgow as world-class institutions. Together we can expand our visitor numbers and greatly improve access across audiences.
There are, of course, major challenges ahead, most prominently, funding. The Kelvin Hall partnership has already shown what can be achieved, and there is the potential for even greater success through a joined-up approach from central and local government. University museums are more visible, more open and more successful than ever before. It is a picture to be proud of, and one to protect.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here