THE cultural sector in Scotland awaits the UK Government’s Budget announcement with trepidation: a perfect storm approaches. Warnings have been issued to prepare for significant financial challenges. But further cuts to the public funding that supports the arts infrastructure in Scotland, the bedrock of a cultural offering recognised worldwide for its quality, will undoubtedly lead to the disappearance of many irreplaceable arts organisations.
The sector in Scotland has already weathered cuts of more than one-third in real terms since 2010, including a year-on-year collapse of Lottery funding, which until now has been used to shore up Creative Scotland’s core funding for theatres, galleries, venues, literature, and more. Creative Scotland would need an increase of 48 per cent or £22 million on the 2016 budget simply to match the real-term level of 2010. Arts Council England, by contrast, this year announced £170m new investment into 180 additional National Portfolio Organisations.
Core funding reductions are compounded by threats from other areas: if Barclay Review recommendations are implemented, millions could be wiped from the budgets of arts venues across Scotland. Further cuts to local authority budgets will wipe out grass roots community arts activities.
We welcome the positive public statements made by the Scottish Government in acknowledging the central role culture plays across our society, and we applaud the major new investments in film and the Edinburgh Festivals, The Burrell Collection and The V&A in Dundee. Clearly, the will to support arts and culture exists at the highest level.
However, big flagship investments cannot substitute for the basic funding that our everyday, small-to-medium sized cultural groups need to exist. If these disappear, which many will if predictions about cuts to regular funding organisations (RFOs) are correct, how will we nurture and sustain the highly skilled but low-paid artists who deliver arts, culture and creative experiences to audiences across every community in Scotland?
We have now arrived at a tipping point where even a small cut to Creative Scotland’s Grant-In-Aid, alongside reductions in Lottery and local authorities, will devastate Scotland’s cultural infrastructure. Damage to this infrastructure, developed with the aid of public investment over the last fifty years, will be irreversible.
Conversely, a very small increase in funding would allow the core infrastructure of arts and culture in Scotland to survive and to thrive.
The argument for investment is strong. The arts and culture sector is one of the most efficient and dynamic in the country. In 2015/16 RFOs attracted £109m of extra investment from non-public sources and created 1.62 million public participation opportunities. In 2015, 92 per cent of adults in Scotland participated in a cultural activity and Scotland’s creative industries contribute £4.6bn gross value added (GVA) to the Scottish economy, supporting 73,600 jobs.
We are proud to live in a country that values arts and culture for its own sake as well as for its wider societal impact on health, education, justice and communities. Government funding is vital to this ecosystem. We ask the Scottish Government to demonstrate that understanding in the Draft Budget to come.
Seonaid Daly, Director, Scottish Contemporary Art Network; Jude Henderson, Director, Federation of Scottish Theatre; Marc Lambert, Literature Alliance Scotland; David Watt, Chief Executive. Arts & Business Scotland; Jan-Bert van den Berg, Director, Artlink Edinburgh & Lothians; Janie Nicoll, former President, Scottish Artist Union; Fiona Logue, Director, Craft Scotland; Sara Graham, CC Skills, Nations Director; Dave Watson, Head of Policy and Public Affairs, Unison; Robert Livingston, Director, Regional Screen Scotland; Claire Stewart, Director, Creative Edinburgh; Diana A Sykes, Director, Fife Contemporary; David Francis, Director, Traditional Music Forum,
c/o 103 Trongate, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel