IT was with great regret that I read the final piece to be written by your esteemed athletics correspondent and Sportswriter Doug Gillon last week (“Fifty years of sporting memories as Gillon bows out”, Herald Sport, October 28).
I worked on both sides of the media divide with Doug over many years and found him to be not only an even-handed journalist with integrity and a sense of purpose, but also a writer whose work was invariably founded on in-depth research, forensic analysis and hard-but-fair questioning and ultimately written with the reader – as opposed to himself or his editors – in mind.
One of the UK’s finest sports journalists, with a plethora of Olympic and Commonwealth Games to his name Doug’s work acted as a bulwark against the incessant and grinding wall-to-wall coverage of football, a sport which, unlike his work in athletics, basketball and the corrupt world of sports administration had no need to fight for column inches, irrespective of its banality.
Doug was never one to put the boot in, far too smart – and decent – for that, preferring the precision of the scalpel as his journalistic tool of choice and any aspiring young sportswriter – and some of his contemporaries too – would be wise to study his considerable body of work.
My fear is that his departure will only lead to the further and inexorable march of what is, admittedly, the national game and it is to be hoped that his former editors will continue to filter their choices through a prism as if the bearded one were still around.
Sport in Scotland in general, and The Herald and its readers in particular, owe a huge debt of gratitude to Doug Gillon, whose likes we may never see again.
Enjoy a well-earned retirement, Doug, and as there must be a book or two in there, don’t unplug the laptop yet awhile.
Mike Wilson,
3 Lochhill Farm Cottages, Longniddry.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel