AS one of the steadily increasing band of over-65s who are continuing to work (albeit in my case, on a part-time basis) your front page headline ("Half of Scots will work beyond 65", The Herald, October 27) set me thinking.
One of the minor pleasures of working into senesence is that, after one's 65th birthday, employee NI contributions are no longer deducted from salary. However, I wonder how long it will be before a Chancellor of the Exchequer, always on the lookout for new sources of revenue to feed the government's voracious demand for money, decides to restore this impost.
Christopher W Ide,
25 Riverside Road, Waterfoot, East Renfrewshire.
I MUST admit I was shocked to read in your columns that David Dimbleby is celebrating his 79th birthday (On This Day, The Herald, October 28). Surely it’s an absolute disgrace and a tragedy that an individual 14 years past his retirement age has to continue working part-time in the evenings just to keep body and soul together? Then again it appears to be Government policy that age is no barrier to an individual being productive, self-supporting and not a drain on the public purse.
I for one don’t begrudge him some of my TV licence money. After al l, it comes out of my state pension, it’s not as if I have to earn it. Perhaps we could organise a crowd-funding site to make life easier for him rather than him having to use his free bus-pass to criss-cross the country to appear on Question Time. It would release the chairman’s role to be taken by a younger individual, perhaps even a woman. It just goes to show that an Eton education and membership of the Bullingdon Club is no guarantee for an easy life and demonstrates the folly of burning £50 notes at its initiation ceremony. Breaks your heart to see it. Poor old soul.
David J Crawford,
85 Whittingehame Court,
1300 Great Western Road, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel