By Kate Seymour, head of policy for Macmillan Cancer Support
WHEN the House of Lords and Tory back-benchers unite to stop a benefit cut, you know it’s a cut too far. Last year these unlikely groups tried – and failed – to stop a cut to Employment Support Allowance, a benefit that was a lifeline for people with cancer and other illnesses.
The UK Government said reducing the money paid to new claimants who are too ill to work, but expected to work in the future, would encourage people to get back to work faster. Many in their own party disagreed. Tory MPs rebelled. The House of Lords twice voted down the proposal.
Macmillan led a vigorous campaign against it. We argued strongly that no-one is helped back into work by being made poorer and having to worry about money as well as their health. Sadly, the proposal was finally passed. From April this year thousands of cancer patients, and those with other illnesses, have been £120 a month worse off.
Our research has previously found that 80 per cent of people in Scotland with cancer are £420 a month worse off after treatment. That was before the cut. We want this benefit to be reinstated for all cancer patients across the UK and we continue to campaign for this at Westminster.
But right now we have an opportunity in Scotland to use our new welfare powers to mitigate this cut and make sure no one has their recovery from cancer hampered by financial struggles.
Last week we gave evidence to the Holyrood Social Security Committee that is looking at how the new welfare system should be set up in Scotland.
We urged its members to make Scotland the first place in the UK to reinstate this vital benefit for people with cancer.
We estimate 280 cancer patients in Scotland are affected. Giving them back the £30 a week would cost the Scottish Government just £400,000 a year, just 0.5 per cent of the recently announced government underspend.
This payment is vital to help cover the additional costs cancer often brings, including extra heating bills, special diets and travel costs to hospital.
Without it we risk people who should be focused on their health having to struggle with money worries and making decisions based on financial desperation rather than what’s going to help them recover.
Giving people with cancer enough money to cover the cost of essentials isn’t about keeping them on benefits forever.
While some people may never be well enough to return to work, we know many people want to work after cancer, and with the right support, can do so. That’s why we’re also calling on the new social security system to make sure everyone with cancer is given expert support to get back to work when they feel ready.
Helping people recover as fully as possible after a cancer diagnosis also means making sure people are directed to the right support as soon as possible after diagnosis.
Right now, we know too many people are missing out on much-needed financial help, sometimes because they just don’t know it’s available. That’s why it is essential every cancer patient in Scotland be guaranteed an assessment of their financial needs.
This new social security system is a once in a lifetime opportunity to make this happen. To make Scotland the first place in the UK where cancer patients get the financial help they desperately need.
We hope the Scottish Government will seize this opportunity to make Scotland a country where cancer patients can focus on their health, not on keeping a roof over their
head.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here