By Euan Bruce, ?Senior Associate at DLA Piper
A RECENT study by NHS Scotland found that the number of Scots being prescribed antidepressants has risen from 6.1 million last year to 6.4 million in 2017. With the NHS in Scotland spending £44.6m a year on medication for patients suffering from mild-to-moderate depression or anxiety, managing mental health in the workplace is more important than ever.
The increase can perhaps be explained, at least in part, by the fact that both employers and employees are becoming more aware of mental health issues in the workplace. However, there is still a hesitancy for some employers to engage with employees who are, or may be, suffering from mental health problems. This lack of engagement can often exacerbate issues or allow them to fester.
From an employment law perspective, it is important to highlight that there is no difference between mental health and physical health. In either case, if the impairment causes a significant and long-term effect on the individual then it will be classed as a disability. The employer will then be obligated to ensure that reasonable adjustments are made to accommodate the employee and that they are not otherwise discriminated against. The definition of a disability also differentiates someone with an underlying mental health condition from someone who suffers stress as a response to a stressful situation.
The difference between a physical and a mental condition lies in identifying the issue and how it is managed. A broken leg or an infection are readily identifiable and have an immediate impact on the employee. Mental health issues, on the other hand, will build over time. The employee themselves may not even recognise the impact of the condition and may not seek medical assistance as a result. In such scenarios, the intervention of a colleague on a personal level can make the key difference in getting the employee to open up.
Once an issue has been identified, it is important to keep the lines of communication open, ideally with a single point of contact to ensure consistency and to develop an understanding of the employee’s condition. Medical advice will also be key to understanding the employee’s prognosis and what they can and can’t do. However, care should be taken to ensure that the medical advice is appropriate. Some GPs lack the time and training to adequately deal with mental health issues and a fit note gives little real insight as a result. Sending an employee to occupational health often does not mean that a psychiatric specialist will be involved. If asking for a medical report on the employee an employer should also recognise that if they make a very general request for information, they can expect a very general response. If they want to understand specific aspects of the employee’s capability then they have to ask the question.
Mental health and how to deal with it will vary from person to person and there is no easy answer or single process which can be followed. The employer is expected to do what it reasonably can to ensure that the employee can return to work and carry out their role. However, there is a limit to this. Work is all about fulfilling requests, dealing with employees or members of the public and is often stressful. An employee is engaged and paid to meet those requirements. If their mental health means that they are not capable of fulfilling their role and they have been provided with reasonable support and the opportunity to improve, then an employer is entitled to bring their employment to an end.
SAMH (Scottish Association for Mental Health) is the local charity partner of DLA Piper in Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel