THE Scottish Government’s decision to reject calls by Govan Law Centre for a fee waiver for consumers wanting to go bankrupt is not only disappointing but also, ultimately, likely to be an expensive mistake, resulting in £8.6 million of fees having to be repaid if legal challenges are successful (“Ministers facing court challenge on ‘unlawful’ bankruptcy fees”, The Herald, August 5).
There have always been application fees for people who want to go bankrupt; however, prior to 2008 the process was carried out by the courts, and as such, where someone was not able to afford the fee and in receipt of certain benefits, they could get a fee waiver or apply for legal aid.
In 2008 this changed, when the function was transferred to an officer of the court, the Accountant in Bankruptcy (AiB). With that change, fee waivers and legal aid were removed. The effect is that we have people crippled with debt, surviving on £73.10 per week, who must find £90 to apply for their bankruptcy, or £200 where their debts are over £17,000.
The nature of the remedy has not changed, so why abandon the principle of helping people access justice when they cannot afford it? An AIB spokesperson has said that they are “fully satisfied that fees for accessing bankruptcy are fully compliant with the law”, but provide no explanation as to why considering the Supreme Court Ruling.
We don’t know how many of those who use bankruptcy afford to do so and the AiB have never explained it, particularly when they are on benefits. The irony is that once a debtor is made bankrupt and their only income is Jobseekers Allowance or income support, they are not required to pay anything towards their debts, as their income is considered too low, yet we expect them to find £200.
They can pay the application fees in instalments, but considering the subsistence lifestyle of many, there is irrefutable evidence that this causes hardship. There is also evidence many are forced to borrow money, which is a reckless situation for the Scottish Government to create, knowing as they do that those wanting to apply for bankruptcy cannot afford to repay the debts they already have.
The problem with the Scottish Government bankruptcy fees is they do not recognise some people cannot afford to pay them and don’t offer any form of fee waiver or remission on the grounds of affordability. That is what is likely to make them illegal. They lack proportionality.
This inevitably will mean, considering the Supreme Court ruling, there will be challenges and if it is found are illegal, the AiB may have to refund the £8.6 million in fees they have collected since 2008; or they could just join their clients in bankruptcy.
Alan McIntosh,
Govan Law Centre,
18 Orkney Street, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here