THE Scottish Government has regularly been strongly critical of the use of benefit sanctions by the Department for Work and Pensions against those deemed to have failed to comply with job-seeking requirements or to fulfil employability placements.
It would therefore have been impossible to continue with a similar policy when powers over employability were devolved to Holyrood.
But the adoption of a system which appears entirely voluntary is likely to present minister for employability Jamie Hepburn with a different set of problems, from this weekend, when his department takes on responsibility for helping people into work.
The sanctions regime has undoubtedly been popular in some quarters – in Scotland as well as in the wider UK – with a significant proportion of the public believing the benefits system is regularly abused by individuals and families happy to live on state support, with little interest in working for a living.
Mr Hepburn believes public opinion has been “inflamed” by unsympathetic coverage of those reliant on social security, much of which is exaggerated. That is undoubtedly true. But hostile elements of the media and opposition politicians may now make it their mission to find an extreme case where benefits appear to be funding someone who has consciously opted for idleness.
The Herald has also been critical of the DWP’s use of sanctions. Threatening people is questionable, threatening them with destitution often for weeks at a time is inhumane, carrying out that threat immoral. In addition the problems caused by losing your only income are hardly conducive to any attempts to find work.
But Mr Hepburn is staking a lot on the success of what can be offered through a new, more holistic approach in Scotland. Without compulsion, employability programmes must be much more attractive to participants than the UK Government’ s unimpressive Work Programme.
The Scottish Government has often said it could do better. Now Mr Hepburn has to deliver.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article