IN the aftermath of terrorist attacks, social media can be a heartening place to be. People normally pull together to express sympathy, condolences and solidarity. Indeed, following recent terror attacks in France, locals often took to Twitter to help those caught up in the chaos by letting them know their doors were open.
While much of the same sentiment was around following Wednesday's attack on Westminster, something much more sinister snuck its way in to the reaction. It feels these days as if some agreement has been struck by the very worst forces in the world to swamp social media with constant provocation and ignorance.
Not only did we have trash talk all over Twitter, we even had ex-English Defence League leader Tommy Robinson exploiting the social media age by thrusting himself in front of any camera he could find at the scene to get some exposure. The far right knows how to take advantage of the outrage ticket, and no situation is serious enough for them to put common decency ahead of their agendas.
We should expect this from the Robinsons of the world, and the Twitter trolls who love nothing more than a tragedy to thrive on, but it didn't stop there.
It became a free for all, and politicians and journalists were among the worst offenders. While factions all over Twitter dealt with the fallout by slinging mud about how the other side was behaving, the truth is that they were all as bad as each other.
In Scotland, focus fell on the Scottish Parliament, which had just started the second day of debate on a vote to allow Nicola Sturgeon to seek the legal tools to hold a second independence referendum when news of the attack broke.
Later in the day, Tory MSP Jamie Greene ignited a slanging match when he took a swipe at pro-independence campaigners who'd been gathering outside of the Scottish Parliament: "Multiple fatalities at Westminster. Holyrood suspended. Yet still a bunch of 'Yes' flag wavers outside parliament. Unbelievable," he tweeted.
He deleted it just 19 minutes later, obviously realising he'd called the tone wrong, but an MSP should know better. What he said was already doing the rounds on social media by that point, inflaming arguments that didn't need to be stoked right then.
I was at the Scottish Parliament on Wednesday, and I was in the press gallery of the chamber when the news first flashed up on my Twitter feed. Within minutes, both Nicola Sturgeon and Presiding Officer Ken Macintosh had left the chamber, presumably for a security briefing and to make a decision on whether the debate should continue.
The parliament acted fairly swiftly amid an ongoing, developing crisis in London. It was the correct decision to suspend proceedings – such an important debate in Scotland requires MSPs' full attention, and that would have been impossible in the circumstances, not least because of their concern for colleagues in Westminster who were in a locked-down parliament.
However, until that point, it had been set to be a big day in Holyrood. It's no surprise that activists would have been gathered there, and Greene's comment was in severely poor taste.
But his tweet was mild in comparison to others which intimated similar notions of a repugnant and disrespectful Scottish Parliament, and taking such cheap political swipes was shameful.
Before anyone could get on the moral high ground, however, one controversial figure associated with the independence movement had already sent everything in entirely the other direction. Stuart Campbell, who blogs as Wings Over Scotland, infuriated tweeters with a flippant approach to the unfolding tragedy.
"I hear all McDonalds staff have walked out of work to show respect over the Westminster attack. No of course they haven't," he tweeted, followed by: "I wonder if hundreds of furious Yoons are screaming that the Welsh Assembly needs to be suspended."
Campbell's later tweets clarified that he didn't think parliaments should give in to terrorism. The rest of us were left wondering whether he'll ever give in to common sense.
The inevitable result of all this was horrendously insensitive bickering. There were unionists arguing with nationalists in Scotland; left-wingers arguing with right-wingers throughout the rest of the UK and beyond; journalists and members of the public using criticisms of point-scoring as point-scoring exercises against one another; and let's not even get started on the likes of Katie Hopkins and their glee at some chaos to revel in.
All this is saddening, because the many, many people who did use their platforms to urge people to come together and look after one another found it a lot harder to rise above the noise.
A few people really ought to be ashamed. Let’s hope they realise that.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here