ONE wonders what on earth families from across Argyll and Bute are expected to make of it all.
Education Scotland, the country’s schools’ inspectorate, has just published a damning report into the way the council runs its primaries and secondaries.
The report, one of the worst ever published by the body, grades the council’s performance as “weak” in four out of five categories including delivery, improvement and leadership.
The report also has a concerning critique on standards, reporting that pupils’ progress in literacy, numeracy and academic qualifications by the time they leave is lower than it should be.
Calling for “urgent and sustained” action the report concludes: “Overall... there remains considerable scope for further improvements in attainment.
“In several important measures of attainment, young people in Argyll and Bute do less well than learners who have similar needs and backgrounds from elsewhere.”
A public statement from Ann Marie Knowles, the council’s executive director of community services, said changes were being implemented, but she also criticised the inspection.
And an extraordinary paper prepared for the council’s community services committee shows the extent of the council’s antipathy towards the inspection process, which is now the subject of a formal complaint.
This unprecedented rebuttal of almost every step of the process includes a self-evaluation of performance which grades every category as “satisfactory” rather than “weak”.
It states: “The inspection process and the conduct of the inspection team have been the subject of serious and significant concerns which have been raised formally with Education Scotland.”
Concerns include use of out dated inspection benchmarks, last minute changes to the timetable and a lack of checking of statements by inspectors.
Other complaints focus on the conduct of members of the inspection team which suggests they “pre-judged” the outcome of the report, adopted an “adversarial” approach, and took an “inappropriate focus” on individual officers.
Time will tell what the voters of Argyll and Bute will conclude, but it is already clear how John Swinney, the Education Secretary, views the report.
Using it as an example of why he believes the status quo in Scottish education is no longer viable he said: “I cannot honestly put my hand on my heart and say every local authority in the country can provide the quality of support that their schools require.”
There is also the matter of the public reputation of the inspectorate wing of Education Scotland.
In a climate where public institutions which support education have taken a public battering, inspectors, while perhaps still viewed with suspicion and even a little fear, are still seen as providing an independent inspection process with a duty to report their professional judgements without fear or favour.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel